Calling the rightful criticisms if Democrats being shitty a tantrum is bullshit. And FDR's good deeds outweigh the bad, but they don't justify them. None of that is relevent to previous shitty leaders not justifying current shitty leaders. FDR was far better than his predecessors and successors.
If they were rightful criticisms instead of whiny gibberish mixed with Republican smears, you might have a point but you'd still be wrong.
Doing what Newsom does is hard. It's a choice to couch all your "criticisms" in vitriolic and demeaning terms - it's a choice that Republican propaganda has taught you.
Yes, Republicans showed that authentic anger is more successful in building electoral support than decorum and careful empty language. Embrace it or keep losing. The difference is our criticisms are backed by substance. Newsom is cruel to the homeless, pro cop, and anti trans. That's bad.
You criticisms are backed by idiocy. Anger is a good motivator for the right, and perhaps for crackpot "leftists", but it doesn't work for a Democratic majority - which is why Sanders keeps losing, for example. Newsom signed the most significant state expansion of trans rights, clown.
anyway, enough of your drivel - mute on.