he may be properly vilified, but people like you will continue on parroting his bullshit I already said they shouldn't get a pass. meanwhile you are over here repeating that Trump should have gotten a pass for his misconduct
Replies
The liberal New York appeals court threw out the fine, because James and Engoron were out of line.
aug 26, 2025, 4:04 pm • 0 0 • view
but the judgment? that is, the primary result of her case?
aug 26, 2025, 4:06 pm • 0 0 • view
The primary result was to tie up Trump during the campaign and to extract a massive financial penalty. It backfired on her as the law-fare made people sympathetic to Trump and helped him get elected. And the penalty was thrown out.
aug 26, 2025, 4:17 pm • 0 0 • view
No one cares that judgement is still in place. It’s meaningless as are the 34 “felonies”.
aug 26, 2025, 4:17 pm • 0 0 • view
"we don't care that we voted for someone who routinely committed fraud. also, trust him and us when we say we really care about fraud"
aug 26, 2025, 4:23 pm • 0 0 • view
She either committed fraud or she didn’t. Whether Trump is making the accusation is irrelevant. And Trump has been the subject of many completely bogus investigations starting with the Russian Collusion hoax. I’m not saying that Trump is perfect. But the cases brought by Alvin Bragg, James and
aug 26, 2025, 4:30 pm • 0 0 • view
and that piece of human flotsam in Georgia, Fani Willis were all political persecutions. And know, I don’t believe any of them.
aug 26, 2025, 4:30 pm • 0 0 • view
it's weird how it matters who is the subject of the investigation/who is bringing charges...sometimes the fact of the matter is that you asserted, without qualification, that the targets of the Trump admin partisan targeting are guilty. you're a good little soldier for your dear leader
aug 26, 2025, 4:33 pm • 1 0 • view
“the targets of the Trump admin partisan targeting are guilty” I don’t know WTF that means. Is Trump targeting? Or are you talking about the people targeting Trump? Never mind, I don’t care. You have offered nothing of substance, nothing but your hypothetical which contradicts the obvious reading
aug 26, 2025, 4:40 pm • 0 0 • view
The Trump admin is targeting people for partisan reasons My discussion of deeds of trust and riders isn't hypothetical, it's reality. you can even find the standard documents on the FNMA website! Your poor reading skills don't negate that (not that you've actually read a DoT)
aug 26, 2025, 4:43 pm • 0 0 • view
of the CNN article. You’ve got nothing, so you’re forced to obfuscate. It’s a waste of my time. Feel free to say I ran away because I was scared of your superior intellect. I’ll be over here, enjoying being right.
aug 26, 2025, 4:40 pm • 0 0 • view