She probably won't. But that's part of the natural distribution, not the result of massive doping, even if it's unvoluntary and natural.

wait so female dominant puberty is NOT doping but male dominant puberty IS doping? i don't think you know what doping is

I know what doping is. Do you know what testosterone is and the different levels in male and female bodies? Female puberty isn't doping for women, male puberty isn't doping for men The higher testosterone level during male puberty is the reason why sports are segregated by sex in the first place.

probably won't what? i asked if it's FAIR

It's as fair or unfair as any other example of natural variation. Different than changing the definition of a protected category in a way that negates the reasons for the protection. If you want to change that definition without destroying it you have to find compromises that won't include everyone.

ok, this is good, you want to talk about definition what is your definition of woman that excludes all trans women and doesn't exclude any cis women?

trans woman is also a protected category, unless the transphobes get their way