avatar
Matthew Sadler @matthew-sadler.bsky.social

"household income" There are people who have no income at all, nor a house.

jun 19, 2025, 1:21 am • 11 0

Replies

avatar
John Q Public @conjurial.bsky.social

But making transit free for *everyone* is a much less targeted way of addressing poverty than giving these people a check Why should we not just, y’know, fix the problem by fixing the problem?

jun 19, 2025, 2:16 am • 6 0 • view
avatar
Anywhy @anywhy.bsky.social

When is there ever the political will to give poor people a check? "Free stuff" exclusively for the disadvantaged just triggers conservative and gentry backlash. Make it free for everyone, and people across the spectrum can all feel some benefit. It's unifying.

jun 19, 2025, 7:21 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
John Q Public @conjurial.bsky.social

yeah! I'm still not generally sold but this is a good argument for doing it, sometimes might be enough reason to

jun 19, 2025, 7:25 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
John Q Public @conjurial.bsky.social

substantially this logic is what keeps Social Security so untouchable, everybody gets benefits

jun 19, 2025, 7:26 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Anywhy @anywhy.bsky.social

Exactly. Free buses isn't a high priority for me, but I won't dismiss the idea outright. I think it's something worth trialing, maybe one line at a time, to figure out NYC-specific issues. In Westchester we sometimes have free buses during the summer. More people ride. The system doesn't collapse.

jun 19, 2025, 7:32 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
John Q Public @conjurial.bsky.social

Some other good arguments here for it but “some people are poor” is an argument for giving those people money, not making services free for everyone

jun 19, 2025, 2:17 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Matthew Sadler @matthew-sadler.bsky.social

Free transit is still better for poor people than a stigmatizing dispensation.

jun 19, 2025, 3:01 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
John Q Public @conjurial.bsky.social

is it stigmatizing to get a free bus pass in the mail that looks the same as the passes everyone else buys?

jun 19, 2025, 4:58 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Matthew Sadler @matthew-sadler.bsky.social

It can be to the person themself or to the person who refuses "charity" but could stand to benefit.

jun 19, 2025, 5:01 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
John Q Public @conjurial.bsky.social

yeah, ok, I mean, this is where you have to look at tradeoffs avoiding that residual sense of stigma is not worth the foregone fare revenue from everyone else -- money is fungible and that revenue buys more frequent service, better and more comprehensive routes, even other government services

jun 19, 2025, 5:03 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Matthew Sadler @matthew-sadler.bsky.social

Would undocumented immigrants or any other population face barriers with accessing such assistance? I'm trying to look at all angles. What are some jurisdictions that have implemented such a scheme?

jun 19, 2025, 5:07 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
John Q Public @conjurial.bsky.social

oh probably, yeah, but I can't imagine doing a serviceable job of outreach would cost more than all the remaining fare revenue?

jun 19, 2025, 6:02 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
John Q Public @conjurial.bsky.social

Republicans frequently make assistance to the poor stigmatizing by making it bureaucratic, dysfunctional and conspicuous, but it doesn't have to be!

jun 19, 2025, 4:59 am • 3 0 • view
avatar
Politically_Illinois ⚾️ @pol-il.bsky.social

So we should defund transit? What’s the logic?

jun 19, 2025, 2:06 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Matthew Sadler @matthew-sadler.bsky.social

Yes, no funding at all, that's clearly what I said.

jun 19, 2025, 2:08 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Politically_Illinois ⚾️ @pol-il.bsky.social

You’re proposing one of the greatest demolitions of transit funding ever seen. No other way around it

jun 19, 2025, 2:09 am • 0 0 • view