We’ll get that changed. What happened is the photo had that caption attached from a previous article it was used for, and we forgot to change the caption to reflect its use as a file photo on this new article.
We’ll get that changed. What happened is the photo had that caption attached from a previous article it was used for, and we forgot to change the caption to reflect its use as a file photo on this new article.
it's actually pretty important to remember to do this kind of stuff before you publish it in your newspaper
What would be REALLY COOL is if the article talked about how we could top the list again with bike infrastructure that’s not just painted lines (hmm, Hennepin bridge, Portland Ave, Central Ave, etc).
I did a bike tour through Minnesota a couple years ago. I paid nothing for the trails, lanes and various pathways -- but I did spend a lot on food, lodging. Doing 50 miles a day more or less, I spread my Michigander's money around.
An article that says bike riders should pay more for city infrastructure than people who don't? What are taxes for?
Wow that’s a terribly embarrassing (and telling ) gaffe @startribune.com
Thank you!