Nah, he always intended to go to the riot with a rifle. A rifle he had a friend buy for him illegally. It’s really something to watch you and yours rally ‘round your little proud boy.
Nah, he always intended to go to the riot with a rifle. A rifle he had a friend buy for him illegally. It’s really something to watch you and yours rally ‘round your little proud boy.
There was no evidence that either Rittenhouse or Dominick Black had any intention of being in Kenosha to guard property before being asked by Nick Smith who, according to Smith’s testimony, only contacted Black about it on the morning of the 25th, just hours before the shootings.
The rifle had been purchased lawfully three months prior by Dominick Black, who owned and kept it at his address. It was never Rittenhouse’s gun. It was intended to be, in January 2021 when Rittenhouse turned 18, but that transfer never happened, ultimately. Black always owned it.
"Nah, he always intended to go to the riot with a rifle. A rifle he had a friend buy for him illegally." Even if this were true, it has no legal bearing on whether it was or wasn't self-defense. You're allowed to defend yourself with an illegal weapon. It happens in gang cases all the time.
Unfortunately, this account blocked me. But, the way you are destroying them with facts is absolutely hilarious. Are you responding to the same account? Of so, I'm shocked that you haven't been blocked yet.