Huh! A “coding error” conveniently deletes part of the constitution that dear leader isn’t fond of? I’m not a conspiracy guy, but this would be quite on brand. Seems awfully convenient!
Replies
I know coding errors. That just doesn’t pass the smell test.
aug 6, 2025, 9:21 pm • 6 0 • view
Sickening.
aug 6, 2025, 10:04 pm • 0 0 • view
It's bullshit. Also, it's not a conspiracy. Thinking that way when it's clear as day is what they want us to do. What they say is "truth" and facts are "conspiracy".
aug 6, 2025, 9:45 pm • 3 0 • view
Completely agree with you!
aug 6, 2025, 10:25 pm • 0 0 • view
Did they need to change the code? Why?
aug 6, 2025, 9:15 pm • 1 0 • view
That would be an oddly specific coding error
aug 6, 2025, 9:40 pm • 1 0 • view
The only coding error here was putting a fascist coded party back into power.
aug 6, 2025, 9:28 pm • 1 0 • view
In the very least they did no QA testing before pushing this into Production - the public website 🙄. Either this is a very bad IT department or it was on purpose. Or both.
aug 6, 2025, 9:16 pm • 1 0 • view
I think they just got caught. Not too many coding errors would leave very specific content elements out. Likely a test to see if it could be done. They were caught.
aug 7, 2025, 12:37 am • 0 0 • view
To be fair, if a coding error deleted any random part of the Constitution, there’s at least a 75% chance it would delete something that Trump isn’t fond of.
aug 6, 2025, 9:18 pm • 3 0 • view
With was Russel Vought has been saying recently, won't be surprised if the take care clause in article 2 and the clause giving Congress the power of the purse in article 1 is also stripped.
aug 6, 2025, 10:00 pm • 0 0 • view