These people wouldn’t know the scientific method if it smacked them upside their heads.
Replies
Quack
aug 29, 2025, 11:48 pm • 1 0 • view
Which it will, eventually
aug 29, 2025, 9:54 pm • 1 0 • view
We should test that hypothesis, just to be safe.
aug 29, 2025, 11:53 pm • 2 0 • view
Remember to replicate the test enough times to make the results statistically significant.
aug 30, 2025, 1:05 am • 2 0 • view
Large target here
aug 29, 2025, 10:02 pm • 1 0 • view
LOL
aug 30, 2025, 12:04 am • 0 0 • view
Stephen Miller, one of the world’s foremost experts in vampire bats.
aug 29, 2025, 9:41 pm • 8 0 • view
We should run an experiment on that. Happy to arrange that double blind study. I propose 1/2 smacked with a 2x4 without any scientific method, and the other 1/2 randomly smacked by the same 2x4. Guessing 1,000 participants from the administration would be a large enough sample size.
aug 30, 2025, 3:11 am • 0 0 • view
A expert in something, for them, is someone who knows how to destroy the object of their expertise. In this sense, Netanyahu is a expert in Palestine and Eichmann was a expert in Jewish people.
aug 29, 2025, 10:22 pm • 1 0 • view
Just because it’s called The Scientific Method doesn’t make it a catch-all term for doing science stuff, you silly goose.
aug 30, 2025, 6:49 am • 1 0 • view
How do they lie so brazenly?
aug 29, 2025, 9:39 pm • 2 0 • view
Because not a single journalist will push back on their lies or call them out, all in the name of “access”.
aug 29, 2025, 11:11 pm • 1 0 • view
That’s a good hypothesis. I wish we could test it.
aug 30, 2025, 3:06 am • 0 0 • view
wouldnt it be nice if a journalist asked him to state what he thinks the scientific method entails
aug 29, 2025, 9:41 pm • 3 0 • view
A year ago I would have thought that that headline came from The Onion.
aug 30, 2025, 6:48 am • 1 0 • view