Why is so difficult to see that it was a terrible candidate? In a healthy democracy the system needs parties aligned with reality.
Why is so difficult to see that it was a terrible candidate? In a healthy democracy the system needs parties aligned with reality.
Needless now Work together to subvert trump
If you refer to oppose vehemently against and democratically. That is the way to go. An example of political laziness was to leave federal abortion rights depending on decision court. Are Dems, working on a federal law?
We need to cast aside these differences rn. Literally what russia wants βThe ideal scenario is to maintain the schism and uncertainty in the States till the end,β says Pavlovsky. βOur candidate is chaos.β www.gq.com/story/why-do...
Terrible candidate that was able to raise over $1 billion in 100 days? Right.
Unfortunately, they use effective scare tactics that cause people to vote against their own interest.
She was an excellent candidate. The misinformation and other BS directed toward her didn't help.
She was a fantastic candidate. Stop. Just stop.
Lolololololol
So, Harris was a terrible candidate yet Trump won, so that makes him a good candidate? Living up to that user name, I see...
The results say clearly that Trump was marginally a better option than what the Dems offered. Let that sink in.