So should we stop selling anything that could potentially be ingested that could be harmful? Where is the line?
So should we stop selling anything that could potentially be ingested that could be harmful? Where is the line?
The line is at ‘creating a product for sale with a high risk of illness or fatality if used normally.’ That is a perfectly reasonable line. We’ve had regulations for many years and they worked. Now we probably will not have them but we should make it inconvenient and difficult to deter that result.
Sounds like a good reason to sue gun retailers
There WAS but the politics prevented it.
💯
It was from a “natural” grocery store. What are they selling it for if not for human consumption? This isn’t an animal feed store. Both the store & the dairy knew EXACTLY what they were doing. If they lose their businesses, they won’t be selling dangerous milk anymore, so good.
So sue the store and the dairy because they sell something harmful and claim it is healthful. There is evidence of the harm—someone was harmed by using this product as it is normally used. The lawsuit brings out information about this process so it is good if we don’t want people to do that.
yes.