avatar
Kate Good 📚 @katesgoodreads.bsky.social

So should we stop selling anything that could potentially be ingested that could be harmful? Where is the line?

aug 17, 2025, 7:19 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Ozma @rowyourbot.bsky.social

The line is at ‘creating a product for sale with a high risk of illness or fatality if used normally.’ That is a perfectly reasonable line. We’ve had regulations for many years and they worked. Now we probably will not have them but we should make it inconvenient and difficult to deter that result.

aug 17, 2025, 7:23 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Natty Bowditch @nattybowditch.bsky.social

Sounds like a good reason to sue gun retailers

aug 17, 2025, 7:46 pm • 6 0 • view
avatar
Ozma @rowyourbot.bsky.social

There WAS but the politics prevented it.

aug 17, 2025, 7:48 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Mask Wearing Doggie @tbas7000.bsky.social

💯

aug 17, 2025, 9:14 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Victoria Dahl/Victoria Helen Stone @victoriadahl.bsky.social

It was from a “natural” grocery store. What are they selling it for if not for human consumption? This isn’t an animal feed store. Both the store & the dairy knew EXACTLY what they were doing. If they lose their businesses, they won’t be selling dangerous milk anymore, so good.

aug 17, 2025, 7:26 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Ozma @rowyourbot.bsky.social

So sue the store and the dairy because they sell something harmful and claim it is healthful. There is evidence of the harm—someone was harmed by using this product as it is normally used. The lawsuit brings out information about this process so it is good if we don’t want people to do that.

aug 17, 2025, 7:28 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Victoria Dahl/Victoria Helen Stone @victoriadahl.bsky.social

yes.

aug 17, 2025, 7:29 pm • 2 0 • view