I'm sorry but no. The state of emergency must be defendable. The legality should be in question.
I'm sorry but no. The state of emergency must be defendable. The legality should be in question.
Unfortunately, the justice system works slower than the dictator. Almost everything he does can be challenged in court. It is legal until some judge says it isn't and then he appeals and appeals again.
No it's not 'legal' until the courts disagree. It's not legal to murder someone until you are found guilty in a court. That's not how the law works. It's being allowed by people who should be defending our freedoms but it's not fucking legal.
Look I don't like out or support it! But, the premise used by Trump (and sadly he happens to be Pres.) is that it is "legal". Until a co-equal branch rules otherwise it effectively is. I don't set the rules, I can only observe.
When you use the term 'legal' to describe this situation, you absolutely do support it.
Your accusation is unfounded, incorrect and absurd. I've been wasting my time interacting and patiently explaining over and over the contrary. Clearly, you are not reading and or comprehending my posts. Goodbye.
It's only legal in DC.
You are probably correct. So, the state AGs are going to get real busy, if he orders a deployment to Chicago, as seems to be the case. .
It's only legal in DC if there's a reason for a state of emergency.
Correct. But Trump's "legal" and our legal are not the same thing. Just the same word.
State of Emergency needs to be declared by the governor and backed by statistics and neither of these things happened
Argue that in court on behalf of D.C. If you win, I'll be the first to applaud.