avatar
Brkynmind @brklynmind.bsky.social

I don't need to explain it. We all know, they know. Why on earth do you think it's effective to start explaining shit like life is a masters course in gender studies. WAKE UP WE ARE IN A FASCIST COUNTRY.

aug 26, 2025, 11:56 pm • 1 0

Replies

avatar
David Atkins @davidoatkins.bsky.social

Yeah that's what I thought. "Deadnaming" isnt masters course in gender studies stuff. It isnt fully mainstream yet, but it is getting there. You can paraphrase and talk around it but it's inefficient.

aug 27, 2025, 12:00 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Brkynmind @brklynmind.bsky.social

keep talking efficiently, everyone has tuned you out, and while you were blabbering they started following a fascist.

aug 27, 2025, 12:03 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
David Atkins @davidoatkins.bsky.social

Let me know the last time "deadnaming" was used in voter facing communications, don quixote.

aug 27, 2025, 12:07 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Brkynmind @brklynmind.bsky.social

Voters don't have social media?

aug 27, 2025, 12:16 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Brad Reed @bwreed.bsky.social

OK but can we kill land acknowledgements? I thought that performative bullshit was dead already

aug 27, 2025, 12:04 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Kathleen E. Corley, PhD @drkathleenecorley.bsky.social

My point is using this preferred language is inefficient for gaining votes.

aug 28, 2025, 1:35 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Kathleen E. Corley, PhD @drkathleenecorley.bsky.social

Yes, my point.

aug 28, 2025, 1:34 pm • 0 0 • view