A group with vague and unknown funding sources is paying influencers to have direct oversight of what political commentary that influencer makes, and is forbidding then from disclosing the fact they are involved with that group, and you just think..."Yea that all seems above board!"
So is "evidence" a word you're allergic to or just one that's invisible to you
Now you move the goal post to simply "the article isn't true" lol
The article doesn't provide evidence that it's true. It just kinda shouts "these people are taking money from a source no one knew about" and then you go to the sites that they're complaining about and they openly talk about it. It just sounds like you're falling for an op
Ok so you admit you just don't think the article is true.
Also, you do know we have laws in place for political ad funding right?
Kinda weird to do that whole "is ____ invisible to you?" routine when there are posts directly engaging with the point you just made that seem to be invisible to you
I'm not aware of any evidence that Donald Trump raped Katie Johnson. Am I not allowed to think it's bad that Donald Trump raped Katie Johnson?