yes.. considered only mil-pop.. right now in RU, w/40% budget spent in war, nothing mush else is wort considering...
yes.. considered only mil-pop.. right now in RU, w/40% budget spent in war, nothing mush else is wort considering...
Of cause it is. It would be stupid not to. Because economy and sociaty are needed to support the war. A war is not only won with guns in hands.
Also i gues Rudsia wants to have a Russia after that war. With ... an economy and ... people and ... well a better situation than before the war xD
sorry, I fully disagree.. their aim is territorial expansion beyond USSR limits, NOT prosperity.. & RU never cared @ its people.. their official declaration (medvedev): RU from Lisbon to Vladivostok, at any price..!
Than you just dont know what you are talking about.
bsky.app/profile/noel...
That has nothing to do with my statement. AGAIN! send me shut that proves your point or dont.
what do you think my point is?
Many people means losses not bad. Basicly.
nothing of the sort.. simply said losses are not critical...
Yea. Definetly are tho. And the reason you thibk that is that you see " number big. Smaller number no problem " and also because you clearly want that to be true.
You just fail to see that war is not only supported in the Battlefield.
know it all too well.. but unfortunately RU's position is not as "bad" economically as stated in many posts & western press.. I don't fall for propaganda.. economy is not rosy but certainly not catastrophic in putler's land...
of course.. only you do apparently...