avatar
Wannabe Apparatchik @apparatchikwannabe.bsky.social

eh, china’s system has demonstrated a real ability to deal with succession, they’ve handled many leadership transitions before, and the system of party leadership pre-Xi wasn’t actually that old

aug 16, 2025, 2:19 am • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Birdy @iansiegel.bsky.social

Problem is there is no successor

aug 16, 2025, 2:20 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Wannabe Apparatchik @apparatchikwannabe.bsky.social

then it goes back to power being split among a few different offices, like they had before Xi, until the party consolidates behind someone, Xi wasn’t a designated successor either.

aug 16, 2025, 2:23 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Wannabe Apparatchik @apparatchikwannabe.bsky.social

china’s one of the rare cases of a real party authoritarianism, of which the others are mostly some communist dictatorships, or the institutional despotism of the PRI—namely, that they are internally-coherent political systems with legitimate rules that are capable of outliving individual rulers

aug 16, 2025, 2:25 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Wannabe Apparatchik @apparatchikwannabe.bsky.social

will china’s system eventually fail? yeah, but i don’t think it’s super likely to be from a succession crisis unless a successor tries playing the populism card and it gets out of hand. a lot of china’s structural issues are more of a “this will pop up eventually” rather than tied to Xi’s heartbeat.

aug 16, 2025, 2:27 am • 0 0 • view