avatar
Benjamin Pope @benjaminpope.bsky.social

the thing is they’re properly useful for some technical functions! And yet people want to use them for completely inappropriate things

aug 19, 2025, 11:23 pm • 49 0

Replies

avatar
Erinn O'Dear @erinnthered.bsky.social

They are only useful for technical functions to people who already know how to do them. That's the problem. A regular algorithmic program can do a lot of that stuff without the plagiarism and climate destruction.

aug 20, 2025, 3:27 am • 155 4 • view
avatar
Hgmvhf @hgmvhf.bsky.social

I'm thinking we could probably improve those algorithmic programs with a small fraction of the trillion dollars spent on AI.

aug 20, 2025, 1:32 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
Erinn O'Dear @erinnthered.bsky.social

But then the billionaires couldn't justify their giant server farms!

aug 20, 2025, 3:29 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
The Barbarienne - I will wish ill where I want to @thebarbarienne.bsky.social

It's like grammar checkers. You have to have solid grammar knowledge to be able to judge if the suggestion is correct; and if you have solid grammar knowledge, you probably don't need a grammar checker.

aug 20, 2025, 2:20 pm • 12 0 • view
avatar
aaronmfc.bsky.social @aaronmfc.bsky.social

Omg so much this. If you don’t know enough to be able to spot lies and mistakes then it’s nearly useless.

aug 20, 2025, 12:24 pm • 43 1 • view
avatar
chuckles2000.bsky.social @chuckles2000.bsky.social

Worse than useless. People "learn" bad info. It propagates errors.

aug 20, 2025, 6:28 pm • 13 0 • view
avatar
Cats, Sims & Books @catssimsbooks.bsky.social

GenAI is useful for nothing. You may be thinking of Machine Learning, which is VERY different.

aug 20, 2025, 6:18 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
The Air Whisperer @pneumofoils.bsky.social

No, they aren't. Automated Ignorance APPEARS to be 'properly useful for some technical functions' - but without constant input from a human 'pilot', they quickly diverge from the reality we hope to explore by deploying them... bsky.app/profile/benj...

aug 20, 2025, 1:28 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
OG Blockhead @ogblockhead.bsky.social

Like vacuum cleaners

aug 21, 2025, 1:48 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
𝙃𝘼𝘾𝙆𝙀𝙍𝙈𝘼𝙉ᴴᴹ @hackermanhm.bsky.social

they've tested this, and in general, it isn't it feels like it is because you spend less time on the task itself, but this is outweighed by time spent messing with the LLM and its output

aug 20, 2025, 6:37 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
canonical sarah @scgriffith.bsky.social

what technical functions

aug 20, 2025, 1:16 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Ceramic.Atheist @zaphodbeeblebr0x.bsky.social

What technical functions??

aug 20, 2025, 4:40 pm • 3 0 • view
avatar
liaskwerklooi.bsky.social @liaskwerklooi.bsky.social

people use them for anything because they're breathlessly hyped as the Second Coming of computing. Can't wait til this stupid (and harmful) bubble pops

aug 20, 2025, 3:50 am • 12 0 • view
avatar
Kiera the Thief @kiera-the-thief.bsky.social

In the US, there's more AI CAPEX this year than the entirety of consumer spending. It's going to be a rough time when the bubble pops.

aug 20, 2025, 8:34 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Benjamin Pope @benjaminpope.bsky.social

Afaik not quite - it contributed more to growth than consumer spending did. But still nuts

aug 20, 2025, 10:52 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Kiera the Thief @kiera-the-thief.bsky.social

Ah, thank you for the correction - serves me right for reading quickly.

aug 21, 2025, 3:55 am • 0 0 • view