IMO, you just want to avoid “statistically significant” because its technical meaning is so narrow, and it does not mean anything like “important”—even though that's what is sounds like it means. In other words, a statistically significant result isn't necessarily a significant result.
Thank you. I always like to learn something and while posting something wrong is embarrassing it’s nice to know, on this at least, I won’t have it happen again because of you 🙂
What an intelligent, gracious response to someone. I loved seeing it and thought I’d jump in to say 👏👏👏
I think I am remembering a low C in that class 😂