Occurs with software development. Really fucking annoying dealing with someone who utilizes LLMs for "writing" their code and when it, inevitably breaks, me having to explain the issue that is ***one of the first things the documentation for their tool talks about***. Erosion of critical thinking.
To a certain degree I think people, well, hate thinking. They want some black box to offload one of the more difficult, yet extremely important functions of life, to. It's one thing to use something as a helpful tool, it's an entirely different thing to offload your cognitive function.
More frustratingly is, they're offloading it to a black box that is itself fundamentally incapable of cognition. It's exhausting being around and engaging with people who are so, allergic, to the idea of trying to learn new things.
Are they so fundamentally devoid of anything resembling character, or they feel that they are, that they feel a "stochastic parrot", an analogy I got from a friend, has more intrinsic worth to it? Well it doesn't. Even if you fail, horribly, that has more intrinsic value, to me anyways.
Failure at least shows, well, your fallibility as a human, and you can take, lessons from that, find tools to *help* you in the future... But they usually see little value in trying, or learning from other people's work. They see it as a commodity. One they're *owed*.
My brain is getting scattered, mixing up a lot of related but unrelated things together here. That's all for now. Fucking hate how LLMs are being used in 99% of scenarios. It is legitimately exhausting trying to explain this shit to normies. I do like the analogy, "stochastic parrot"... Yeah.
I need to read more. I'd be able to draw from more, succinct and accurate language to describe the organized amorphous blob that are my thoughts. I see the structure, yet I can't describe it. To be continued...