Frankly this just makes you sound like you’ve only heard of her from other people

She did literal investigative journalism. Care to show me anyone debunking her findings?

They thoroughly debunked it by saying "Yeah well... so what??" followed by "C'mooooon"

I saw BTC's "response". Contrary to what this guy may think, I do consume media outside my bubble, and I had already come to the conclusion that these figures could not be trusted. It should be obvious with all the cozy, non-confrontational, fawning coverage they provide to establishment dems.

BTC has always been way too glossy and commercial and extremely centrist to trust, he was clearly auditioning for some corporate sponsors or Pac money and he finally got his wish. Hope he's enjoying it!

💯

I haven't seen her evidence. If you make accusations you need to bring evidence.

Her evidence is published in a public article on a major website called Wired.com. She brought the evidence that you haven't bothered to look at. /just sayin'

The article is paywalled and I didn't see the contract shown in the video.

That's fair. No paywall: archive.is/202508291731...

You're accusing the editors of Wired of letting her publish this without vetting her work... Read the article or watch her video. The implications of these financial ties is disturbing. Your attitude is what Dems purchased. Sorry your favs are shills.

I don't trust any mainstream media outlet anymore, why should I trust Wired? She says a lot about what's in the contract, but why hasn't anyone published it? It seems like no one knows what the words "shill" or "dark money" mean.

Yeah, people can't tell what a shill is when it's staring them in the face laundering the reputations of genocide appologist centrist dems. If the claims made regarding the contract were even half as spurious as you're making them out to be, BTC would sue for libel. If he does, I'll eat my shoe.

It's up to the person making the accusation to provide proof.