Then, one night, Janet heard investigator Maurice Grosse say “All we need now is the voices to talk”, and QUITE BY CHANCE they began to do exactly that. A man called Joe Watson spoke, and came back the next night with a new name: Bill Wilkins. They asked JoeBill how he died
Not an ordinary, unremarkable death, you say? WELL, WELL. The other Society of Psychical Research investigator, Guy Lyon Playfair, asked Bill why he wasn’t visible, and got the perfectly reasonable answer: “I’m invisible… because I’m a G.H.O.S.T.”
The story went on to inspire The Conjuring 2, Sky’s 2015 show The Enfield Haunting, and – perhaps most famously for those of us of a certain generation – the BBC’s infamous broadcast-once-sparking-a-reported-million-complaints Ghostwatch
You may have gathered that I am perhaps a tad less accepting of the supernatural explanations than others are. So, come on, then, Coates. If you’re so clever, what did happen? Well, obviously Guy Playfair believed it (and quite by chance also got a book out of it)
The two male investigators stayed in their house for 14 months, often sleeping in the same room as the two young girls. At one point the ghostly voice calls one of the Investigators a "dirty old man"
Blimey
This guy is a "paranormal investigator" but he's very matter of fact about stuff. His video on it is interesting. youtu.be/eG-619AnK5M?...
Ah, thank you
However, in his 1988 book, Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox, magician Bob Couttie says Playfair was “a devoted believer in Uri Geller”. Maurice Grosse was “a sincere and honest man”, but had joined the Society of Psychical Research on losing a child a year before
Hit by something as awful as that, Grosse may understandably have wanted – needed – to believe. Couttie also notes that “Families afflicted by these phenomena are often deeply unhappy”. Janet and her sister Margaret were just hitting puberty and had recently seen their parents split up
Writer and former magician Joe Nickell notes that Janet was interviewed about the phenomena by the Daily Mail in 2011 skepticalinquirer.org/2012/07/enfi...
He adds: “The principle of Occam’s Razor – that the explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is the best one – well applies here”, and that the evidence suggests the sisters’ fakery was “closer to 100 percent”
I mean, this might be a photo of a child shoved on top of some furniture by a spook while a concerned uncle looks at the camera, but it could also be a child who’s climbed up there, and pretended to faint, while an uncle looks around, thinking “Jesus, this is fucked up”
There’s also this from “psychology professor (and expert sceptic) Chris French”
Also a good point!
A book and an interview by two magicians? I see the hand of Big Magic Circle* in keeping this story down. *No, YOU stop it.
Hahaha
I am just reading Ben Machell's new book, a large chunk of which is about Tony Cornell, also of the SPR who also investigated and was intensely sceptical. I think it led to a major split in the organisation.
Oh, interesting. Thank you
Chasing the Dark by Ben Machell review – the original ghostbuster | Biography books | The Guardian share.google/lSTjinSab2Fk...