Great point. Or maybe I just agree with fellow coward/dummy Justice Jackson's take on the Roberts Court in a recent dissent: “This is Calvinball jurisprudence with a twist. Calvinball has only one rule: There are no fixed rules. We seem to have two: that one, and this administration always wins.”
Yeah except she was commenting on an actual case brought before the court, but you’re just stewing in vibes
Take the L dude
If you don't get she's making the exact same point as me you should head over to instagram for kids
She’s not making the exact same point as you, because you aren’t a Supreme Court Justice, you’re a poseur with a phone.
calling someone a poser and spelling it with a u
ROFL wut
And my friend if you claim that you and Ketanji Brown Jackson are in any way comparable, you’re delusional. She is not a coward. She operates under threat of death every day. She is not a doomer reply guy. That’s just you.
Good point I get it now she's saying the constitution doesn't matter to the Roberts Court and they always rule for Trump and I'm saying the constitution doesn't matter to the Roberts Court and they always rule for Trump thanks for clarifying
Again, you can’t even cough up a scenario where a case would even make it to the Supreme Court, but you’ve already declared defeat and then ordered *me* to take an L. You’re a loser and a coward. Bye now.
2 R voters challenge laws not requiring voter ID in 2 federal courts in 2 different circuits based on Trump's exec order. There's a circuit split because one case is brought in TX. SCOTUS rules for Trump.
My only legal training is seeing My Cousin Vinny and I developed this totally plausible scenario in 2 minutes