(1/) Hi. Californian here. A friend indirectly showed me your post while using a jab involving a Complete Monster known as Roger Retinz. And I have stuff to say about the DINOs running the show in house democrat, having personally experienced the problems myself to my persistent detriment.
(2/) For starters, I had to go through a whole host of politics involved with my parents' house. This document, originally intended to be private for enough reasons, explains a definite amount up to the last edit date of 11/10/2021 for what is directly copied w/o change: mega.nz/file/IyoEiZR...
(3/) That edit date is relevant, because it proves I was wrongfully denied critical information about my mom's death influencing my living situation. I only found out about said information a month in early December 2021 and absolutely would have addressed it at minimum in the doc if I had known.
(4/) Unfortunately, people in CA just aren't on my side about the mess, and in case you couldn't tell from the doc's info, this includes family members. This eventually led me to being subject to police brutality during the AM of 3/28/2024 at my parents' house for trying to protect my dad's ashes.
(5/) I found an opportunity to call out the police brutality at a meeting being held in the church near Montalvin Park by officials. The officials didn't even care to hear out my points about their short-sightedness in adding gates to address dumping in general.
(6/) I especially called out about how pet dumping was a thing. The politicians wanted to ignore the disregard to pet life, a problem in its own right. No, apparently, I was only caring about the police brutality. I'm sorry, but I'm bringing up a good point regardless of my reasons for being there.
(7/) There's more issues like how the likes of the Genki Girl staff worker at Pathway to Choices would be overworked into becoming lifeless by the time the Kincade Fire happened. I would think we would get that stuff addressed, not deal with politicians who only care about their lip service.
(8/) I can actually tell you how if somebody comes by who just happens to be "PDX by way of Montalvin" or something like that, that person is likely a given enabled Jerk With A Heart Of Jerk who has already been playing political games to make things worse for cheap laughs.
(9/) I would like to point to the draft for the first chapter of my work since I'd be wanting to make jabs at California and Texas (which is problematic in its own right) there: docs.google.com/document/d/1...
(10/) And I can state on record: Saul Floueques isn't meant to be correct. He's simply supposed to be flawed but ultimately sympathetic. Hence the hubris birthed by hostility from the enabled likes of totally not the piece of filth actually rightly called out here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8JD...
(11/) I can further cite that a female character designed to be Pure Good and in support of Saul without signs of better cognizance would be surprisingly easy to write as a Magnificent Baddie without breaking her being a Sheep In Sheep's Clothing. I can be confident on that much.