Less than what the Republican billionaire donors gave Trump to his campaign or through SuperPACs. It seems you don't understand how the election system works.

It seems you made an assumption, and cannot read as well, skipped right over the word "spend" Harris spent 1.9billion, trump spent 1.6 billion........ it seems basic facts elude you.

Trump had more money because of SuperPACS. Musk spent a huge chunk to get Trump elected. It's not just campaign expenditures you need to take into account, but the SuperPACS who decide the winners. americansfortaxfairness.org/billionaires....

We also need to discuss earned media and how Fox News and their like gave billions of free airtime to Trump and his campaign and actively advocated for him. inthesetimes.com/article/bill...

To persuade voters, you need 7 touches. Be it in person block walking, phone banking, text messages, or ads. Fox News does more than that in a single day. It's how they brainwash people. That is why they are considered state media. www.socialmediatoday.com/content/seve...

To win elections, you need money for filing fees, merch, office hqs, supplies, phone banking, text banking, yard signs, billboards, misc things, and ADVERTISING. If you have free advertising like Trump does through Fox News advocating for him. It matters. www.sfexaminer.com/forum/fox-ne...

The amounts listed include the Super pacs, they just don't have to disclose where the money came from.......... also harris didn't only spend more money but also raised more money as well, stop making excuses for democrat failures.

UHHHH i already proved you wrong on one account, you really wanted to double down on being wrong and come back for more????????????