If the Supreme Court thinks universal injunctions are unconstitutional, to wait until *now* to say that, in this of all cases, with this of all presidents, is a devastating indictment of both its impartiality and its prudence.
Replies
Notice they came to this ruling AFTER the nationwide injunction on Mifepristone is no longer in play.
jun 27, 2025, 5:53 pm • 2 0 • view
The Supreme Court is a disgrace and a threat to Democracy in America. It is not a moment too soon to #Resist
jun 27, 2025, 5:32 pm • 2 0 • view
Yea anyone surprised ?
jun 27, 2025, 4:23 pm • 0 0 • view
To be fair, there was never any doubt about its lack of impartiality and prudence. 😞
jun 27, 2025, 3:28 pm • 1 0 • view
Most corrupt SCOTUS ever. Yes, I'm aware of the Lochner Era and Taney courts.
jun 27, 2025, 6:15 pm • 15 1 • view
bsky.app/profile/tamp...
jun 27, 2025, 7:51 pm • 1 0 • view
jun 27, 2025, 6:44 pm • 1 0 • view
They were most likely bought by the trump admin
jun 27, 2025, 9:10 pm • 0 0 • view
The backstop of an honest and experienced SCOTUS always controlled the nuanced interpretations and refinements to the US Constitution. Today, it is clear that the overall impartiality of the highest court in the US is anything but neutral, compromising all judgments it makes.
jun 27, 2025, 3:34 pm • 0 0 • view
I’ll say it one more time: The US Constitution must be amended so that the overall political makeup of SCOTUS can be seen and proven to be neutral; otherwise, doubt will continue to be cast on the impartiality of judgments.
jun 27, 2025, 3:25 pm • 5 0 • view
Has Congress just said "oh that Judiciary Act of 1789 is rock solid" for 200-something years, or just abdicated? SCOTUS says their opinion is based on that law. Seems like the path to fix this would be for Congress to change the freakin' law!
jun 27, 2025, 4:51 pm • 2 1 • view
And exactly what is that law and was it applied correctly? Seems like many ancient laws were not used correctly.
jun 27, 2025, 5:15 pm • 0 0 • view
It's nuts. They weave their opinion together thoroughly, but as a layman all I read is "well we base this on that old law and the British legal concepts that precede it" and give little thought (purposely) to how things have changed since then.
jun 27, 2025, 5:19 pm • 0 0 • view
I hope Blue states are readying their legislations for gun laws, schools, LGBTQ, environmental protections and healthcare rights now that a TX district court can't stop them. It goes both ways Supreme Court. Welcome to the 50 States of America.
jun 27, 2025, 4:41 pm • 261 32 • view
Except it doesn't go both ways.
jun 27, 2025, 4:54 pm • 53 1 • view
This is exactly it. They will enable trump to gut everything while they step back, and then kill any attempt to rebuild should Republicans lose a majority. This will greenlight state level voter suppression as well, preventing any meaningful pushback.
jun 27, 2025, 4:58 pm • 71 4 • view
Doesn’t matter we need to do it anyway, stack the deck, flood the Supreme Court, make them work 24/7 if they want to destroy democracy. And then we should protest them at their houses, at dinner. They should never know a moment of peace as long as they work to destroy our great nation
jun 27, 2025, 5:24 pm • 99 13 • view
We have to use the SC ruling against them. A Class Action takes years to go through the courts and the SC says that's how it has to be done. In the meantime - no injunctions so the laws stand until the courts stop it - for that one person who filed the lawsuit.
jun 27, 2025, 6:02 pm • 35 2 • view
Une chose est certaine,il faut agir et faire quelque chose car ce grand pays qu’est l’Amérique perd un peu plus de sa démocratie un peu plus chaque à chaque jour qui passe et si cela continue de la sorte,à un certain moment ça deviendra irréversible même si on en est pas encore la non plus 🇺🇸✊
jun 27, 2025, 6:26 pm • 9 1 • view
T R U T H
jun 27, 2025, 6:43 pm • 1 0 • view
1776 taught us there is no point where democracy is no longer an option. Millions are already speaking out, millions more will join.
jun 27, 2025, 6:34 pm • 19 1 • view
Je l’espère sincèrement. Je ne suis pas américain 🇺🇸 mais je suis sincèrement de tout coeur avec vous même si ça n’est pas grand-chose je sais. Je suis européen et je suis dégouté de voir certains de nos dirigeants se mettre à plat ventre devant Trump juste par intérêt. Il doit ce sentir encore plus
jun 27, 2025, 6:49 pm • 0 0 • view
roi du monde et ça doit l’encourager à devenir encore plus mauvais qu’il ne l’est quand ils le reçoivent même mieux qu’un roi en lui faisant toutes les courbettes du monde comme la fait hier le chef de l’OTAN Mark Rutte et quelques autres. Lui passer de la crème comme il l’a fait,est honteux et le
jun 27, 2025, 6:54 pm • 0 0 • view
roi Trump,lui,était aux anges de recevoir tant d’honneur et tant de mots doux alors que Trump leurs tordais le bras à tous. C’est vraiment inquiétant de voir ce genre de choses pour un type aussi mauvais que Trump
jun 27, 2025, 6:57 pm • 0 0 • view
I hope you're right
jun 27, 2025, 6:38 pm • 6 0 • view
Le fascisme est arrivé. On se demande comment cela se terminera.
jun 27, 2025, 6:39 pm • 2 0 • view
Oui,il est bien là et je ne suis personne pour pouvoir répondre à votre interrogation mais j’espère que ça se terminera au mieux pour le peuple américain 🇺🇸,sincèrement. Ce qui est certain,c’est que 9 fois sur 10,c’est les citoyens qui mettent fin à ce genre de dirigeants et du mal qu’ils font à leur
jun 27, 2025, 7:00 pm • 1 0 • view
sont mis a genoux devant le grand roi golfeur Donald 🤪 J’étais sidérée de voir ça et à quel point certains dirigeants peuvent être lâche juste par intérêt. Il n’ya vraiment que les américains 🇺🇸 qui pourront mettre fin à cette administration plus qu’horrible et je vous souhaite sincèrement le
jun 27, 2025, 7:07 pm • 0 0 • view
meilleur et pleins de courage 💪 🇺🇸✊🇪🇺
jun 27, 2025, 7:08 pm • 1 0 • view
pays. L’Amérique est la première puissance et je ne crois pas qu’un seul autre pays ne viendrait en aide au peuple américain 🇺🇸 si ça empirait. Je suis européen et nous avons tous constaté le manque de courage criant hier au rassemblement des pays de l’OTAN où la majorité des dirigeants européens ce
jun 27, 2025, 7:04 pm • 0 0 • view
sont mis a genoux devant Trump et juste par intérêt et sans le critiquer une seule fois par peur de l’énerver. Ça en dit long sur le courage de pas mal de dirigeants européens qui ont laissé ce qu’ils ont dans le pantalon pour cette réunion des pays de l’OTAN avec le roi Trump 🤪🙃
jun 27, 2025, 7:14 pm • 0 0 • view
You can’t flood the Supreme Court. States will just either turn it down, or SCOTUS will refuse to hear it. They don’t give a fuck.
jun 27, 2025, 6:25 pm • 1 0 • view
This is the way. The only way.
jun 28, 2025, 10:14 am • 1 0 • view
Agree 100% These 6 Trump Justices have shown us they will bend to serve the 1 man they made king. It’s these justice who We The People should peacefully protest & raise our voices. They are paving the way for Donny to end Democracy.
jun 27, 2025, 6:43 pm • 2 0 • view
THIS!
jun 27, 2025, 5:29 pm • 3 0 • view
// This will greenlight state level voter suppression as well// As this and other cases were intended to achieve.
jun 27, 2025, 7:51 pm • 1 0 • view
It’s already happening.
jun 27, 2025, 5:51 pm • 0 0 • view
Trump will claim anything he doesn't like is "breaking rule of law" and have the governor arrested and troops on the ground. There will be no "amicable" states rights for blue states, it will be oppression of blue states by the federal government if we don't resist
jun 27, 2025, 9:47 pm • 0 0 • view
They already showed their hand. The same clown court that said "no you can't provide any student loan relief no matter what the text of the law is" also said "actually you can abduct citizens off the street and disappear them, that's fine." We all need to accept the roberts court is illegitimate.
jun 27, 2025, 8:24 pm • 2 0 • view
I don't think it'll be divided by all 50 states. It'll be divided up by the 11th districts. But still, we may be able to accomplish some things. And as far as stopping him, we'll just have to file more lawsuits.
jun 27, 2025, 7:24 pm • 0 0 • view
nice thought, but part of the problem here is this SC is clearly NOT going to actually equally apply the standards and interpretations and conclusions to all cases. they will find or create every absurd loophole to rule with blatant bias, often w/ religious tinge, to favor far RW/red states/bigotry
jun 27, 2025, 5:36 pm • 1 0 • view
Yep, but what the court did here is prolong the ability to get to those rulings. A Class Action takes years to go through the courts and the SC says that's how it has to be done. In the meantime - no injunctions so the laws stand until the courts stop it - for that one person who filed the lawsuit.
jun 27, 2025, 5:59 pm • 1 0 • view
It's obvious by now that The Democrats are on the same team & they are quietly helping the MAGA nazis. The have shown everyone they are two wings of the same parasitic ridden bird. #VotingBlueIsNotEnough #AbandonTheTwoPartySystem #abandondemocrats #vote3rdparty www.newsweek.com/donald-trump...
jun 27, 2025, 7:55 pm • 0 0 • view
A Dem Senate and President must Grow the Court, and Create an Ethics Corruption Enforcement. Add 3 Justices and Impeach the Grifters.
jun 27, 2025, 4:01 pm • 1 1 • view
@gavinnewsom.bsky.social @robbonta.bsky.social @adamschiff.com @padilla.senate.gov @democraticmayors.bsky.social @housedemocrats.bsky.social Get a plan quickly!
jun 27, 2025, 4:55 pm • 0 0 • view
Impartiality 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
jun 27, 2025, 5:21 pm • 0 0 • view
If we ever take power again the attitude towards SCOTUS should be ‘what legions do you command?’
jun 27, 2025, 7:49 pm • 0 0 • view
There is no need to discuss these proclamations from the court as though they were being made in good faith. This is a judicial coup d'etat by fascist operatives appointed for this purpose.
jun 27, 2025, 5:06 pm • 60 13 • view
Amen.
jun 27, 2025, 5:13 pm • 2 0 • view
THIS.
jun 27, 2025, 6:19 pm • 0 0 • view
What’s utterly disheartening is that coup d’état in SC happened during 45th term. And nobody done nothing about it, enabling 47th to play out as it currently is…
jun 27, 2025, 10:01 pm • 1 0 • view
Christofacists
jun 27, 2025, 8:44 pm • 10 1 • view
😡😡😡
jun 27, 2025, 3:51 pm • 0 0 • view
the roberts court is an abomination
jun 27, 2025, 4:49 pm • 4 1 • view
This "Supreme Court" is a shameful disgrace. SIX of them are proven TRAITORS: corrupt, purchased, slime, serving fascism for a buck. History will record these morally bankrupt scum as such.
jun 28, 2025, 7:05 am • 24 4 • view
The Court didn’t say that national injunctions from a DCt are unconstitutional; they said that the enabling statute in question doesn’t permit them. They waited until “now” to say so because no one had teed up the issue previously (as Obama/Biden could have done when NDTx was enjoining theirs).
jun 27, 2025, 4:15 pm • 0 0 • view
What you say makes sense but remember, Biden had ample opportunity to make the same argument during his administration when many of his actions were blocked exactly this way. He chose not to bring the case. Why? Somebody can explain that to me. Maybe SCOTUS would have voted differently then?
jun 28, 2025, 2:24 am • 6 0 • view
Would’ve been wise to have the justices opinions on record
jun 28, 2025, 1:01 pm • 0 0 • view
Associated Builders & Contractors v. NLRB Citation: 2016 WL 3608103 (D.N.D. 2016) Nationwide injunction against the “persuader rule,” which required disclosure of consultants hired to counter union organizing. Here’s another one for the request for clarification.
jun 27, 2025, 5:59 pm • 1 0 • view
And another one for the request for clarification and another. Texas district judge issued an injunction protecting employers from having to provide contraceptive coverage, applying it broadly. Georgia v. Biden Nationwide injunction blocking Biden’s vaccine mandate for federal contractors.
jun 27, 2025, 6:05 pm • 1 0 • view
What about the universal injunction blocking EEOC guidance on criminal background checks and disparate impact? Let’s do them all. Make the Scotus twist itself into a pretzel until they’re forced to say some universal injunctions are constitutional allowing judges, moving forward to still issue them
jun 27, 2025, 5:50 pm • 1 0 • view
Nevada v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 218 F. Supp. 3d 520 (E.D. Tex. 2016) Emergency Scotus clarification request. District court issued a nationwide injunction blocking Obama’s overtime pay rule under the Fair Labor Standards Act. So does that mean that policy is back in place everywhere, except Nevada.
jun 27, 2025, 5:40 pm • 0 0 • view
Franciscan Alliance v. Burwell (Section 1557 of the ACA) the universal injunction blocking enforcement of Affordable Care Act regulations requiring healthcare providers to perform gender transition services and abortions. This one seems ripe. The injunction was never challenged.
jun 27, 2025, 5:36 pm • 0 0 • view
Could this theoretically mean that Obama‘s, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) is back as an official policy. It literally had the exact same scope as the case they just ruled on? Does that mean they have to re-litigate every single case where they upheld a universal injunction?
jun 27, 2025, 5:26 pm • 3 0 • view
We should do an emergency request for clarification. Utilizing every single right winger case that benefited from universal injunctive relief. “Hey, does that mean that this injunction against this gun control law is invalid. Hey is this injunction blocking access to the morning after pill void”
jun 27, 2025, 5:17 pm • 87 17 • view
Abso-f-in-lutely!!! Flood SCOTUS with emergency cases.
jun 27, 2025, 5:32 pm • 36 4 • view
The SCOTUS failed our country.
jun 27, 2025, 4:34 pm • 6 1 • view
What happened? I took my eye off of the dumpster fire for an hour.
jun 27, 2025, 3:01 pm • 3 0 • view
They’re only unconstitutional when they oppose GOP declarations. Who’s surprised?
jun 27, 2025, 5:09 pm • 4 1 • view
Boom! "As of about an hour ago, we have filed a class action and motion for a TRO to stop the executive order on birthright citizenship from going into effect," www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...
jun 27, 2025, 5:53 pm • 1 0 • view
Liberal justices’ dissent: The majority holds that, absent cumbersome class-action litigation, courts cannot completely enjoin even such plainly unlawful policies unless doing so is necessary to afford the formal parties complete relief.
jun 27, 2025, 3:33 pm • 1 0 • view
If class actions are the cure, let’s give it to them. Good attorneys help us out with the complaints.
jun 27, 2025, 4:38 pm • 1 0 • view
lack of impartiality & prudence
jun 28, 2025, 3:35 pm • 1 0 • view
John Roberts - destroying the USA since 2000.
jun 27, 2025, 5:31 pm • 2 1 • view
This court has proved to be dishonest in my opinion!
jun 27, 2025, 3:05 pm • 1 0 • view
They should say all EO ‘s are unconstitutional
jun 27, 2025, 4:55 pm • 4 1 • view
jun 27, 2025, 5:20 pm • 0 0 • view
jun 27, 2025, 5:41 pm • 26 4 • view
Absofuckinglutely. @scotusblog.com @scotusblog.bsky.social The 6 Republicans er Conservatives are on We THE PEOPLE's list of have to go. THAT List keeps growing and you will be happy to know it is fucking bipartisan as shit.
jun 27, 2025, 3:22 pm • 1 0 • view
I hope they all get Covid when they’re on vacation. Make it long, Covid.
jun 27, 2025, 3:30 pm • 3 1 • view
Full-throttle towards illegitimacy
jun 27, 2025, 3:28 pm • 2 0 • view
Yes 😪
jun 27, 2025, 9:21 pm • 0 0 • view
Yeah funny how they let plenty of injunctions stand during Biden administration
jun 27, 2025, 2:40 pm • 58 2 • view
I hate the ruling, but it cuts both ways. Repubs have used courts in LA and TX etc to produce national injunctions against women's healthcare. SCOTUS needs term limits.
jun 27, 2025, 2:54 pm • 34 1 • view
They will find a way to let slugs like kaczmaryk keep killing reproductive rights
jun 27, 2025, 4:31 pm • 1 1 • view
Then those injunctions souls now be null.
jun 29, 2025, 11:20 am • 0 0 • view
WHO WOULD EVER VOTE FOR THAT guy❓️AGAIN❓️If that's the case, you're clearly voting for the cruelty & bullshit in this admin. Let me ask 1 question: Are U OK with the direction your life has headed in the past 6 mos❓️ Unfortunately, we're STUCK W the baby child,wanna be a 🤴IDIOT If that's not WOKE...
jun 27, 2025, 5:20 pm • 0 0 • view
And Ethics Committee to throw out Clarence Thomas for starters.
jun 27, 2025, 4:02 pm • 15 0 • view
Amen
jun 27, 2025, 5:59 pm • 1 0 • view
I agree 💯 with you but think about how many people will be able to sue individually ( especially in regard to immigration or birthright) and also the federal courts will be now totally clogged up.
jun 27, 2025, 3:46 pm • 1 0 • view
Isn’t this the first time the issue has been before the court? In the past, nationwide injunctions were challenged on the merits, not the constitutionality of the breadth of the injunction.
jun 28, 2025, 1:56 am • 0 0 • view
This isn’t actually a defense. Because what it means is that universal injunctions were uncontroversially agreed to be acceptable.
jun 28, 2025, 1:57 am • 4 0 • view
Exactly!
jun 27, 2025, 3:06 pm • 0 0 • view
Roberts is a complete failure. @scotusblog.com
jun 27, 2025, 9:48 pm • 2 1 • view
All conservatives are failures at this point and I'm not just talking about the supreme court. I'm talking every elected official, judge, lawyer and citizen who claims to love this country and believe in the constitution who is enabling Trump. Every single one.
jun 27, 2025, 11:01 pm • 4 0 • view
💯!!!!
jun 27, 2025, 11:05 pm • 0 0 • view
Had prior DOJs ever asked it to hold that universal injunctions were unlawful? DOJ has always opposed them but had it ever gone that far? (Btw today’s holding purports to rest only on Judiciary Act of 1789, not the Constitution.)
jun 27, 2025, 2:39 pm • 102 10 • view
To the first point, I don't think it's been presented this squarely, but I meant "say" that, not "hold" it. There have been plenty of opportunities, and the Justices are not shy about concurrences. To your second point, a court exceeding its statutory authority is unconstitutional.
jun 27, 2025, 2:49 pm • 74 6 • view
I thought Prelogar asked at one point? But I don’t think such a challenge was set up as specifically as this one.
jun 27, 2025, 2:43 pm • 2 0 • view
Ah I see that Prelogar case is for OT 2025 so nevermind.
jun 27, 2025, 2:47 pm • 1 0 • view
Supreme Suck Ass Club. Lifetime appointments. Fucking A!
jun 27, 2025, 3:52 pm • 2 2 • view
The SC just nullified any decisions not their own. So, do all suits now go directly to SCOTUS?
jun 27, 2025, 4:43 pm • 3 0 • view
I don’t know how we can explain this to you if you didn’t think this way when Kavanaugh was allowed to serve… You pick *now* to be shocked?
jun 27, 2025, 4:03 pm • 4 1 • view
Those 6 assholes are legislating from the bench in favor of helping trump at every possible turn. The only way to deal with them is to win back the house and senate and create positions for 5 new SCOTUS justices and appoint them. It’s that, or try to impeach those 6 for aiding and abetting trump.
jun 27, 2025, 6:06 pm • 1 0 • view
It has already long given up and pretense of impartiality or prudence.
jun 27, 2025, 4:42 pm • 3 0 • view
Oh yeah? What are you all gonna do about it? Thats right. Nothing Americans are getting exactly what they deserve
jun 27, 2025, 3:21 pm • 0 0 • view
who knew those originalists weren’t really representing the founding fathers they were in fact helping to craft their original autocracy for this country
jun 27, 2025, 5:38 pm • 7 1 • view
Lets devise a plan to quickly devise & fund a shit ton of class action law suits on all this bull shit. And everyone of the lawsuits should include damages that go back to fund more lawsuits. They wanna play, lets play
jun 28, 2025, 1:25 pm • 14 2 • view
We should just start referr3ing to the SCOTUS as the Reichsgerict.
jun 27, 2025, 8:01 pm • 2 0 • view
Can we at least impeach all the SCOTUS who have blatantly violated laws? I can name a few Clarence and Sam have violated. they are not at all hesitant to pursue all avenues of grievance against any who don't follow their narrow,self serving requirements. No more Citizenship for children born here?
jun 27, 2025, 9:24 pm • 7 2 • view
If state level law enforcement arrested the entire Supreme Court then presumably the Supreme Court wouldn't be about rule that their actions were unconstitutional? 😉
jun 27, 2025, 10:49 pm • 1 1 • view
I just heard about Crockett and Chief Justice Roberts. Can'r find it on You Tube. Cracked his polished shell, I understand? I'll find it tomorrow.
jun 28, 2025, 12:28 am • 1 0 • view
All trump judges, the unholy 6!
jun 27, 2025, 9:34 pm • 4 1 • view
If they swore to constitution and voted against it. I say yes
jun 28, 2025, 10:27 am • 1 0 • view
The Biden Administration asked the Supreme Court to review universal injunctions, and the Court denied the request. Not that long ago...
jun 27, 2025, 6:33 pm • 2 0 • view
to think they ever had any impartiality is as naive as it gets. i hope you now realize your beloved nation was always a careless empire build obly for the ultra-rich.
jun 27, 2025, 3:20 pm • 0 0 • view
There are more of us than there are of them! If the 3 branches of our government, the Supreme Court and the military do not defend the Constitution then we must! Unless “We the People” don’t stand up, our Republic will fall ✊
jun 27, 2025, 3:19 pm • 2 1 • view
SCOTUS believes that what Dear Leader wants is the law apparently.
jun 27, 2025, 4:20 pm • 8 1 • view
And, screw the Constitution.
jun 27, 2025, 5:44 pm • 1 0 • view
We can only hope the Dictator turns on them as he turns on everyone in the end. No one is safe from his backstabbing vileness. Well except for Putin.
jun 27, 2025, 4:36 pm • 1 0 • view
Ummm, how did we get to overturning Roe if this is to be believable?
jun 27, 2025, 5:20 pm • 13 2 • view
Hypothetical question: If someone were 9 months pregnant, would it make a difference what state they gave birth in? Say between a red state and a blue state?
jun 27, 2025, 2:59 pm • 0 0 • view
I think so.
jun 27, 2025, 3:01 pm • 1 0 • view
How about the 4 corners? I went there on vacation with my parents.
jun 27, 2025, 4:16 pm • 0 0 • view
They plan on hiding out until trump is dead impeached deposed 🧌
jun 27, 2025, 5:50 pm • 1 0 • view
the Supreme Court must be held responsible for all the concentration cell deaths, beatings and the felon illegally bombing Iran. They opened this can of rotten ass worms
jun 27, 2025, 3:44 pm • 1 1 • view
Six of the benchwarmers on that "court" should have been prosecuted for violating judicial behavior laws in the Due Process clause of the Constitution. The same rules they recently told lower courts they had to use. Since this "court" lost the 14th Amendment, this "court" is irrelevant.
jun 27, 2025, 6:19 pm • 10 4 • view
jun 27, 2025, 2:52 pm • 30 9 • view
They know who their master is.
jun 27, 2025, 3:06 pm • 2 0 • view
jun 27, 2025, 3:20 pm • 1 0 • view
I guess this needs to be shared more youtu.be/vGAqYNFQdZ4?...
jun 27, 2025, 3:23 pm • 1 1 • view
SCOTUS has been a malign influence almost since its inception. To borrow a phrase from a book I read years ago, "it comforts the comfortable and afflicts the afflicted."
jun 27, 2025, 4:42 pm • 0 0 • view
They don’t care. They’re all acting with complete immunity. The only justice is us. Whenever we decide it’s time to show up in DC and clean house.
jun 28, 2025, 12:54 am • 9 0 • view
I don't think they care, either. They have lifetime appointments to the bench. Why would they care?
jun 28, 2025, 1:45 am • 5 1 • view
Lifetimes can be quick in the USA. Floyd's ended after nine minutes. Tamir Rices only got like ten seconds of judgement.
jun 28, 2025, 3:18 pm • 0 0 • view
So when are Melania, Barron and Melanias parents being deported. Chain migration should be illegal or. Birthright citizenship is. Bye Trumps…. All the children are children of immigrant mothers except one. Deport them all.
jun 27, 2025, 3:59 pm • 13 3 • view
Works for me.
jun 27, 2025, 4:07 pm • 2 0 • view
Works for me, too!
jun 27, 2025, 4:50 pm • 1 0 • view
jun 27, 2025, 8:54 pm • 0 0 • view
The plot thickens! It's like they're trying to outdo each other in a game of constitutional chess, but instead of checkmate, it's check-bust.
jun 27, 2025, 5:34 pm • 1 0 • view
It’s soooo FUCKED UP
jun 27, 2025, 4:01 pm • 2 0 • view
They wait until the last day of session for their most egregious rulings. Remember the immunity ruling? Took 3 months!!
jun 27, 2025, 4:12 pm • 5 0 • view
jun 27, 2025, 4:07 pm • 28 11 • view
I wouldn’t shame animals
jun 28, 2025, 10:26 am • 1 0 • view
Exactly right.
jun 28, 2025, 12:55 am • 0 0 • view
only LIBERAL universal injunctions.
jun 27, 2025, 2:45 pm • 10 0 • view
There’s a Supreme Court? I thought a Supreme Court had real judges!
jun 27, 2025, 3:25 pm • 2 0 • view
SCOTUS have become Dementors: sucking the soul right out of me.
jun 27, 2025, 9:17 pm • 2 0 • view
When legal means of redress are all blocked, resistance will ensue. See the Declaration of Independence.
jun 27, 2025, 7:54 pm • 12 0 • view
But would that be a good thing in the long run?
jun 28, 2025, 3:40 am • 0 0 • view
SCOTUS is compromised. Please explain to me how a Supreme Court top loaded to a certain viewpoint, in this case institutional racism/bigotry/lawlessness, is what the Founding Fathers and the Constitution intended? It’s not, it’s bullshit, and they have effectively fucked thus country beyond repair.
jun 27, 2025, 3:16 pm • 2 2 • view
First off, the founding fathers were racist bigots, so jot that down. They would have been fine w it. Also, conservative activism in SCOTIS is centuries oll Stop worshipping these fucking assholes. They didnt craft an amazing unassailable document of truths immortal. Good God
jun 27, 2025, 4:35 pm • 0 0 • view
Im fucking begging you, Imagine something better than America, because it has actually never been good
jun 27, 2025, 4:35 pm • 0 0 • view
Fair enough and true. Mine is more a poorly chosen euphemism as much as anything. It’s the symbology of a democracy that in pure form can be a good thing isn’t point. But this ain’t it. And you’re missing the broader point. That being the current system needs a strong revision.
jun 27, 2025, 4:37 pm • 0 0 • view
It needs to die. The US state needs to die, and a new state needs to be fought for and won. Otherwise its technofascism
jun 27, 2025, 4:44 pm • 1 0 • view
💯
jun 27, 2025, 5:43 pm • 0 0 • view
The Supreme Court of unconstitutionality is our new reality.
jun 27, 2025, 3:45 pm • 2 0 • view
Where are all of those republicans worried about activist judges now?
jun 27, 2025, 3:03 pm • 2 0 • view
If this were a sports team, we could trade Gorsuch, Thomas, and Alito for better qualified team members. Add Kavanaugh to that list too.
jun 27, 2025, 2:54 pm • 4 0 • view
Add Roberts and remove their retirement benefits and perks.
jun 27, 2025, 4:12 pm • 3 0 • view
Exactly right
jun 28, 2025, 3:10 pm • 0 0 • view
This SCROTUS has forgotten the oath THEY took! To protect Constitution, the Constitution clearly states presidents job! Congress must change Constitution not president or SCORTUS! Very first sentence in Constitution!
jul 19, 2025, 4:55 pm • 0 0 • view
If we survive the Roberts Court and Trump's GOP fascist government. This ruling will be the evidence that congress needs to impeach and remove Justice Roberts.
jun 27, 2025, 2:58 pm • 21 9 • view
That’s a lengthy way of saying they are corrupt and they gots to go
jun 27, 2025, 2:45 pm • 20 0 • view
Nothing supreme about this kangaroo clown court..
jun 28, 2025, 4:15 am • 5 0 • view
indictment of its partiality + impudence
jun 27, 2025, 2:53 pm • 1 0 • view
If we channel our outrage to vote to give us 70 seats in the senate and majority in the house we can impeach the orange and the 6 monsters wearing the cloak of evil.
jun 28, 2025, 1:13 pm • 4 0 • view
Paid whores of Donald Trump & his oligarchy patrons.
jun 27, 2025, 4:01 pm • 2 0 • view
Don't call them "Supreme," they are too partisan for that. Call them the republican Court or the Robert's Court or the crazy Court. Otherwise you are spot on.
jun 27, 2025, 7:05 pm • 4 0 • view
@wyden.senate.gov
jun 27, 2025, 5:25 pm • 0 0 • view
They want a monarch.
jun 27, 2025, 3:59 pm • 4 0 • view
Much like the words "Leader of the Free World," the words inscribed at the entryway of the Supreme Court building "Equal Justice Under the Law" are no more.
jun 27, 2025, 3:06 pm • 7 1 • view
What do we do when they CANCEL ALL FUTURE ELECTIONS?
jun 27, 2025, 5:19 pm • 2 1 • view
SCOTUS is compromised and its about time the democratic party said as much. They are not untouchable. This is who we go after.
jun 27, 2025, 3:45 pm • 6 3 • view
If universal injunctions are unconstitutional, then the Supreme Court has disbanded itself. ALL their decisions are universal injunctions.
jun 27, 2025, 3:12 pm • 3 1 • view
Do Republicans realize they used nationwide injunctions to block *EVERY* student loan relief policy Biden attempted?
jun 27, 2025, 3:40 pm • 1 0 • view
“Lack of impartiality,” which is to say bias
jun 27, 2025, 10:58 pm • 0 0 • view
Breaking: Corrupt and evil Supreme Court Majority continues to take active role in the destruction of the rule of law.
jun 27, 2025, 10:46 pm • 23 2 • view
They’re Bought and Paid continuously. It’s clearly obvious SC MAGA Justices is on Billionaires Payrolls. Why else would they abandon their Oath to the Constitution and give a Guilty Convicted Thug Criminal with 34 Felonies by a Jury, Insurrectionist Terrorist, Treasonous Traitor, Rapist Immunity.
jun 27, 2025, 11:19 pm • 15 2 • view
They’ll make to reverse it should the Christo fascists ever lose power to democracy supporters.
jun 27, 2025, 4:46 pm • 2 0 • view
I'm sure they will immediately vacate all injunctions of Rethugs' favorite Texas judge, Kacsmaryk, right???
jun 27, 2025, 2:59 pm • 3 0 • view
The Supreme Court is completely compromised. There needs to be MASS impeachments in our government. All should be done under clear violations of Constitutional oaths and promises made during confirmation thatbthey clearly lied about. The Supreme Court MAGAs belong in prison with Donold
jun 27, 2025, 3:49 pm • 5 3 • view
There is no one to impeach them.
jun 27, 2025, 4:00 pm • 0 0 • view
I love when unelected officials make major decisions about our government, don't y'all? What are we gonna do about it?
jun 27, 2025, 9:44 pm • 5 1 • view
Keeps both parties from judge shopping.
jun 27, 2025, 3:56 pm • 1 0 • view
Not to mention common sense.
jun 27, 2025, 3:28 pm • 0 0 • view
So blue states could eject ice.
jun 27, 2025, 6:34 pm • 3 0 • view
So blue states could ban assault weapons.
jun 27, 2025, 6:34 pm • 3 0 • view
So blue states could forgive student loans?!?
jun 27, 2025, 6:33 pm • 2 0 • view
Yup. The Supreme Court had no problem with nationwide injunctions against executive orders by Obama and Biden.
jun 27, 2025, 3:30 pm • 7 2 • view
They.Are.Nazis.
jun 27, 2025, 8:23 pm • 1 1 • view
Republican scotus are corrupt and bought.
jun 27, 2025, 10:40 pm • 2 1 • view
YES A THOUSAND TIMES YES!
jun 28, 2025, 3:17 am • 0 0 • view
This was SCOTUS coming to the rescue of their Emperor after the Parliamentarian cut the Big Ugly Bill's attempt to sneak this clause into law. Since they could not legislate it in they had SCOTUS walk it in. And now Heritage Foundation lawyers will expand the decision to end all injunctions.
jun 27, 2025, 4:57 pm • 36 10 • view
They gave this president immunity. I would say they are the dumbest fucks in history. They’re writing their own obituary.
jun 27, 2025, 4:26 pm • 6 3 • view
I believe that if a party wants any movement in its favor, it must approach the Supreme Court with a strong hand, rather than a passive approach that the Democrats often adopt. This is the only way this subservient court responds.
jun 27, 2025, 4:11 pm • 2 1 • view
The Trump court has proven long before this it’s a political body and enforcement mechanism.
jun 27, 2025, 2:55 pm • 2 0 • view
This court has proven since it got the tRUMP appointees forced in that they are not about ensuring the Constitution and the rights of regular people but all about an ideology that has nothing to do with the rule of law - they are trying their best to turn back everything that benefits We The People
jun 28, 2025, 11:56 am • 2 1 • view
bsky.app/profile/prom...
jun 27, 2025, 2:52 pm • 2 0 • view
"Hypocrisy always reveals the lies." RJ Evans, American Heathen® The courts fascist majority have made it abundantly clear they're PROUD of their hypocritical positions.
jun 27, 2025, 3:06 pm • 3 1 • view
I see that you are an employee of Columbia University We don't have to pay attn to anything you say, unless you can tell us how you have vigorously opposed Columbia's deference to Trump
jun 27, 2025, 3:39 pm • 0 0 • view
Bingo
jun 27, 2025, 11:45 pm • 0 0 • view
No Integrity. No faith in the Constitution. No intention of honoring their oaths. No decency. Only capitulation to Trump.
jun 27, 2025, 4:30 pm • 2 0 • view
The Repuglicants in SCOTUS are traitors to the US, plain & simple. They have chosen dictatorship over democracy & we must suffer or fight. Reject fascism! Revolution is now or never! 🌊🇺🇸🇺🇦🌈🟧🌍💙
jun 27, 2025, 3:33 pm • 2 1 • view
medium.com/@thcarter123...
jun 27, 2025, 4:40 pm • 1 1 • view
Yes! They waited for an administration breaking the law and violating the constitution in every direction, then put a stop to judges ordering that the law and constitution be upheld.
jun 27, 2025, 4:51 pm • 28 3 • view
Project 2025 playbook
jun 27, 2025, 5:06 pm • 4 1 • view
See above post on P2025 ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
jun 27, 2025, 5:26 pm • 1 0 • view
So true
jun 27, 2025, 6:18 pm • 0 0 • view
Has a universal injunction question ever previously made it to SCOTUS?
jun 27, 2025, 10:26 pm • 1 0 • view
All it takes is a little corruption to fuck up a good thing
jun 27, 2025, 3:11 pm • 5 0 • view
We are doomed.
jun 27, 2025, 5:32 pm • 0 0 • view
Agree… This is the most corrupt and biased US Supreme Court in the history of the United States. We are drowning in corruption, bias, and propaganda. We are under a dictatorial cult-like regime guided by Project 2025 and the Supreme Court is part of it.
jun 27, 2025, 4:23 pm • 4 3 • view
卐COTUS
jun 27, 2025, 3:51 pm • 7 1 • view
I missed their similar decision when the TX judge blocked access to mifepristone nationwide….oh wait
jun 27, 2025, 4:56 pm • 27 1 • view
The most corrupt and politically motivated SCOTUS in the history of the nation. The venal misogynist with the insurrectionist wife, the beer drinkin' rapist and the Catholic cultist all lied to the American people to get their position.
jun 27, 2025, 5:48 pm • 5 2 • view
If an executive order is universal shouldn't the means the "check" it be universal?
jun 27, 2025, 8:32 pm • 0 0 • view
Believe the Court was reacting to the sheer number of Nationwide injunction written by Fereral judges. Many of the injunction were issued on issues where other injunction had been challenged and overturned.
jun 27, 2025, 6:18 pm • 0 0 • view
jun 27, 2025, 2:59 pm • 56 21 • view
Also, an indictment of its legitimacy.
jun 27, 2025, 3:33 pm • 2 0 • view
So much for Judge Kaczmaric
jun 27, 2025, 5:46 pm • 0 0 • view
SCOTUS is fully dysfunctional. Their supposed impartiality is a thing of the past.
jun 27, 2025, 3:19 pm • 4 1 • view
Man if you think things are fucked now just wait until the next election where republicans are polling poorly…
jun 27, 2025, 3:10 pm • 3 0 • view
Four years of Trump during his first term, and the Court didn't think universal injunctions were such a big problem then. In fact, on several occasions, the Court allowed these injunctions to stand, without opinion, on the shadow docket.
jun 27, 2025, 3:47 pm • 2 0 • view
I guess you don’t have”federal” courts any more.
jun 27, 2025, 7:22 pm • 2 0 • view
Exactly
jun 27, 2025, 4:51 pm • 0 0 • view
The court is already ignored the constitution repeatedly and should thus be ignored
jun 27, 2025, 2:55 pm • 3 0 • view
We lost the SCOTUS. They made themselves worthless tools.
jun 27, 2025, 7:21 pm • 3 0 • view
If democrats ever get power back again they MUST impeach the conservative justices and expand the court. No more nit picky games on this. This court has become openly hostile to the very country to which they pledged allegiance.
jun 27, 2025, 3:38 pm • 1 1 • view
The corruption is so blatant, demoralizing, and infuriating. This is satire, but really the only way I can deal with the destruction of SCOTUS and our nation. politicalamericans.com/justice-thom...
jun 27, 2025, 2:57 pm • 2 0 • view
These people are just pieces of shit. Which means all of us, Americans, are pieces of shit.
jun 27, 2025, 3:12 pm • 0 0 • view
Impeach All MAGA! Let them crawl back in their cave with the rest of the "Donner Party"!
jun 27, 2025, 4:37 pm • 3 1 • view
And eat each other
jun 27, 2025, 5:08 pm • 1 0 • view
Agree.
jun 27, 2025, 3:32 pm • 0 0 • view
Ah, so this is what Republicans meant when they railed against "activist judges."
jun 27, 2025, 2:57 pm • 2 0 • view
They really ned to scrape "Equal Justice Under Law" off the front of the building---it no longer applies as SCOTUS right wing extremist partisan bench legislators no longer understand what that means.
jun 27, 2025, 6:08 pm • 1 0 • view
If democrats ever get the presidency again and that is a big if it will no longer apply
jun 27, 2025, 3:25 pm • 1 0 • view
Nazi six traitors cowards
jun 27, 2025, 6:57 pm • 6 0 • view
Alito: One Side Of Political Fight Is ‘Going To Win Kavanaugh : what goes around comes around This court is corrupt to the core ……
jun 27, 2025, 3:21 pm • 2 0 • view
I would add and their integrity .
jun 27, 2025, 3:17 pm • 0 0 • view
Exactly!!! For them what’s good for goose is not good for the gander
jun 27, 2025, 3:16 pm • 1 0 • view
The Roberts court is fascist.
jun 27, 2025, 6:37 pm • 4 1 • view
It’s the Red Court, nothing else. This is not american jurisprudence. At all. 😞🇺🇸
jun 27, 2025, 2:53 pm • 8 0 • view
Has it been decided before?
jun 27, 2025, 11:33 pm • 0 0 • view
Can we get an Amen to that!
jun 27, 2025, 4:17 pm • 0 0 • view
Has any other administration challenged it? I think that’s half the problem. Dems follow the old rules and republicans are creating new ones. It’s a shit decision though.
jun 28, 2025, 1:44 am • 16 1 • view
Why?
jun 27, 2025, 3:13 pm • 0 0 • view
So what even is next at this point? Will there be another hearing over the constitutionality of his birthright executive order itself at some point? Or is this pretty much it and Trump just gets to literally overturn a constitutional amendment by executive order?
jun 27, 2025, 3:42 pm • 2 1 • view
💯
jun 27, 2025, 3:58 pm • 2 0 • view
Will no one rid me of this meddlesome court?
jun 27, 2025, 2:42 pm • 11 0 • view
Will no one rid of us of six of its members?
jun 27, 2025, 2:46 pm • 8 1 • view
🎊 6 justices have been bought and paid for.
jun 27, 2025, 2:58 pm • 3 1 • view
SCOTUS is also part of the oligarch backed coup. No other explanation is as plausible.
jun 27, 2025, 3:08 pm • 2 2 • view
This is the #DredScott of our generation
jun 27, 2025, 6:28 pm • 4 0 • view
This is exactly the president which Lenard Leo hand picked part of this corrupt Supreme Court for
jun 27, 2025, 6:14 pm • 0 0 • view
Nightmare Decision !
jun 27, 2025, 3:02 pm • 1 0 • view
Said since 2019, PRECEDENTS for the UNPRECEDENTED gets set by filing criminal ct cases, IN COURT, not in Congress Gathering oversight evidence works, but it costs us a fortune & then OUR REPS, as if on our side, KEEP IT IN CONGRESS so its all for nothing unless somebody gets it filed in real court!
jun 27, 2025, 3:51 pm • 0 0 • view
Dismantling our last Branch of Co-Equal check on power with politicized SCOTUS who works for the King of Bribes POTUS Proves how to win BY losing, same as 2020 Election Interference to win 2024 guaranteed! Cases only roll up from non political Federal District Courts if they are lost on appeal
jun 27, 2025, 3:49 pm • 2 0 • view
Obviously yes and the moment theres a dem president theyre gonna change their mind again
jun 27, 2025, 2:57 pm • 4 0 • view
Your political system is broken on all coubts. Even more so because nobody really cares.
jun 27, 2025, 4:02 pm • 0 0 • view
jun 27, 2025, 3:43 pm • 4 2 • view
He will retire before there is any chance of a change in senate majority and a much younger judge will be chosen. This is the obvious politicizing of the court that a 51 vote approval process has made inevitable.
jun 27, 2025, 5:37 pm • 2 0 • view
The Supreme Court has ruled that the US is now a dictatorship.
jun 27, 2025, 2:53 pm • 15 1 • view
This court is criminal and owned by special interests. If it’s ok the disregard the constitution it’s time to start impeachment hearings.
jun 27, 2025, 6:01 pm • 3 2 • view
jun 28, 2025, 4:30 am • 0 0 • view
Don’t worry! When Democrats get into control, they’ll have a “change of perspective” about all the unconstitutional shit they’ve done and roll everything back, including immunity.
jun 27, 2025, 10:25 pm • 0 0 • view
They are obviously for sale and it’s time to dig deep into their private lives & $$ wanna bet there is a lot of dirt there all someone’s gotta do is get a shovel
jun 27, 2025, 3:48 pm • 1 1 • view
Small clue - Harlan Crow 💕 Clarence Thomas💕
jun 27, 2025, 4:45 pm • 0 0 • view
This story begins with three current justices working for Bush 2000 to overturn the presidential election.
jun 27, 2025, 3:50 pm • 1 0 • view