Ahh the old adage of Jobs > Environment. I have a children’s book for you to read to make it really easy understand what depravity you are talking about. The Lorax by Dr. Seuss. Report back Grok AI when you process this.
Ahh the old adage of Jobs > Environment. I have a children’s book for you to read to make it really easy understand what depravity you are talking about. The Lorax by Dr. Seuss. Report back Grok AI when you process this.
You do realise they have had environmental impact assessments conducted, numerous mitigated FONSI’s issued, work closely with the FWS (who manage the area) and are required to protect the reserve next door right?
RIP Boca Chica Beach
No. It’s better than ever my guy It was rundown and forgotten until SpaceX came along. It’s well documented and backed up by natives who aren’t rabidly obsessed with it when they never visited before
That is insane greenwashing by you. The suggest the following article to hear what the natives have to say www.texastribune.org/2025/05/24/s...
“for short periods of time during launches.” So a max of 25 times a YEAR. For a few hours tops, and the same actual limits (500hrs a year, 800hrs total including anomalies if needed) as before for total closures Maybe read past the headline
How about you missing the point entirely. Are you employed by SpaceX or am i arguing with a bot. You seem to have no problem with corporate capture of this area. Go ahead, move to Starbase, Texas if you think its so fabulous
Literal flat earther behaviour
Where’s that coming from? You are the one promoting neofeudalism.
No lmfao
And you can find many accounts of people criticising these guys for complaining about a closures when they’re not frequent and they don’t even go anyway
Huh? Okay Mr. NIMBY
YIMBY*