All these laws are written from the perspective of “binds but does not protect / protects but does not bind,” and looking for loopholes in them ignores that the ability to arbitrarily and capriciously enforce them is the goddamn point.
Replies
it's not about loopholes. I want the people who usually benefit from "protects but does not bind" to realize every single time their privilege keeps them from breaking thin ice. and maybe realize it's getting thinner each day. there is no loyalty. there is no protection. you will fall.
aug 25, 2025, 3:34 pm • 7 1 • view
None of them are going to see your skeet, though?
aug 25, 2025, 3:38 pm • 0 0 • view
buddy, *I'm* one of them lmao. white people are everywhere. many liberals are included in "protect but does not bind". how many traffic stops have you survived in your life? that is *also* this same privilege. it's all one fight. this is a small contribution but it's the one I'm here to make.
aug 25, 2025, 3:42 pm • 1 0 • view
arbitrary enforcement of the law did not start with the current administration. the police state in the US is older than I am, for damn sure. Trump merely harshens and expands it. it's coming for all of us, in a way we've never seen. and the ice will break before you know it, if you're not watching.
aug 25, 2025, 3:46 pm • 0 0 • view
The erosion of unbiased DOJ and FBI law enforcement and their uneven application is seriously compromising the integrity of the justice system
aug 25, 2025, 4:05 pm • 1 0 • view
I get your point, but it was the NY office of the FBI that stonewalled the rest of the FBI looking into, *sigh*, Russiagate.
aug 25, 2025, 5:55 pm • 0 0 • view
I wasn't commenting on a specific case, it was more about establishing facts of what is going on with the DOJ, DHS and FBI. It is amounting to be called a corrupt state
aug 25, 2025, 7:27 pm • 0 0 • view