I mean, what’s the alternative? Have the vice assistant dean delay his vacation house renovation? Have the football team live in squalor among 10-year-old facilities? You academics are so greedy
I mean, what’s the alternative? Have the vice assistant dean delay his vacation house renovation? Have the football team live in squalor among 10-year-old facilities? You academics are so greedy
It’s a bit hypocritical to say “sacrifices need to be made” when your own salaries remain untouched.
What is the net $$ benefit/detriment of maintaining the sports programs? I know there would be a lot of factors in that calculation.
Oh, without a doubt, most football teams at the level of the Ducks make money for the school. The only question is whether the university keeps some of it
What about when factoring in all the other sports?
From my time there, football and women’s basketball were the most popular sports. Like extremely popular.
Also, a lot of track/field competitions happen at UO. Idk how much money the school makes from that, but given that it’s televised and well attended, I can only imagine the financial benefits.
UO athletics are very closely connected to Nike. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nike_an...
In short, basically recruiting / putting Oregon on the map; leading to increased out of state tuition is the benefit. All the other financials are very separate.
I haven't actually read any of the research in question but apparently there's evidence that having a successful football team has a ton of knock-on benefits for the school, even down to things like likelihood of faculty getting published 😵💫😵💫😵💫
Yea, for D1. All those schools at D2 and 3 spend a lot of taxpayer and student money to have all teams, even football and men’s basketball, go. Like millions and millions that they don’t make up in any way. A giant hole to throw money in for the criminal NCAA cabal.
yeah this is what I was shorthanding with "successful football teams." everywhere else it's just delusional admins throwing money into a hole
my kids are trying to get themselves recruited for D1 rowing and I don't have any idea how the benefits they would get would pay for themselves but I'll take it it might be the old idea that if you can lock in and run 4:10 mile in high school you probably have what it take to succeed in college
I might be able to provide a lot of recruiting advice for you to think about. Having stated that, I should post an entirely new thread to follow this one. Others can join in to augment what I'll advise. Stay tuned.
Thanks that prompted a few conversations.
You're welcome, always. My daughter was a D1 level athlete who (fortunately because we discovered written articles early in the recruiting process) realized a D3 environment much better suited her mindset. Best decision ever. Almost all her teammates that went D1 hated it and quit after frosh year.
you can't seriously expect them to eliminate any interrim vice provost positions