having been on both ends of calc 2, i think it really just means he had a bad math background. if you're good at math and understand you're going to be memorizing chunks of formulas, you're fine. if you're not, you may die. traditional weeder course
having been on both ends of calc 2, i think it really just means he had a bad math background. if you're good at math and understand you're going to be memorizing chunks of formulas, you're fine. if you're not, you may die. traditional weeder course
tbh i am surprised anyone who struggled for real in calc 2 made it into medical school though
But also it’s a really strong data point that his IQ gang should look at and say: not a genius. (I’m not in the IQ gang.). That’s what I don’t get.
the beauty of iq is that as long as you cling to your iq your actual, proximate failures in the real world aren't real. and if your actual tested iq isn't high maybe it's measurement error because you clearly have the right genes. it's the ultimate cope
i'm sorry if you can't derive that shit on the fly, ngmi :P
that's just memorizing fewer, better formulae imho
(I'm actually kinda surprised scott struggled there; he never struck me as exactly a "good at math" person but certainly as "bright enough in general to handle basic shit")
I wonder if it's related to the mental block you run into with some programmer types on *continuous* math
it could be that but imho if you're tolerably-bright and, like, awake in school, calc 2 may be the first time you actually had to exert any effort in math whatsoever. like. you may technically have been an A math student but have never done anything deliberately before then
This was very much me. I was "good at math" in that I have a good memory and could do mental math kind of fast. Calc 2, and especially linear algebra and dif eq, absolutely murdered me (not least because I was an incredibly lazy college student my first two years as well).
I'm not the person to ask here, I hit it for the first time around age 10 and found it effortless
i had essentially no formal mathematics education until i was an adult, which may explain some things
imho i still haven't had any, i have never taken a math class i did not already know the content to still
oh, I was pretty substantially self-taught from what textbooks I could get hold of too, except I independently reinvented/reverse-engineered a chunk of differential calculus around age 8-9 and then went looking for real materials
i did not have textbooks, which i think made a significant difference. same method i just started significantly later so i was well aware that it was a problem i had