Who produced the graph is entirely relevant. If the intent was to mis-inform or dis-inform, then the source is very much relevant. In your case, it's to spread disinformation and lies.
Who produced the graph is entirely relevant. If the intent was to mis-inform or dis-inform, then the source is very much relevant. In your case, it's to spread disinformation and lies.
The graph is a good fair representation of the VAERS data. Do you dispute that? The motivation for making the graph is not important in judging the validity of it.
That idiot wouldn't understand the fact that he is gaslighted - not in a thousand yearsπ€·ββοΈ...
You are in a cult.
A KKKult member is accusing others of being in a cult. The irony is thick...
I am in no such organisation. What cult do you think I am in and how would you test that? I think you are in the cult of "lefty". I think a good test is to ask you where you disagree with Obama?
Your false consensus bias is on full display. You're like a WoW raid boss I can farm using my 3rd alt account w/out needing to concentrate. Once you learn to think for yourself and stop regurgitating scare words, I'll consider hearing you out. For now, you're just boring. Good bye
Good call ;)
I ask open questions. I point to data/evidence I ask where the evidence is wrong in it's obvious point. You run away. You flail at me. You do zero thinking, just demand that only approved sources are allowed. You are in a cult I might be but I don't see any signs of it, nor do you point out any
Yeah. I almost ran afoul of the Sunk Cost Fallacy. Better to cut my losses now and avoid losing any more brain cells to this clown.
Right? And not only that: It's wasted time to talk to that guy. I've simply got other things to doππ€·ββοΈ... You can't fix stupidπ€·ββοΈ...
I try to fix stupid in you. It is a slow process. But the fact that you run away shows you do know.
The cognitive dissonance won't let him. He is so fully invested in the Big Lie that he can't or won't accept his entire world view is bunk.
How would you suggest we both evaluate if either or bot of us fit that? What thought exercises should we do?
That's the main problem. That's also the reason why even rather intelligent and educated people (not Tim though; he's... just Timππ€·ββοΈ) could fall victim to that crap. Because it's not about logic. The bunk networks are quite proficient in manipulating emotions. And those are hard to fight...