The "Steps to Validate" in the readme are just "look at the logs", if this is legit then I'd expect a demonstration of some concrete impact
Replies
I'm calling slop
aug 29, 2025, 10:02 pm • 18 0 • view
excellent emoji use btw
aug 30, 2025, 12:56 am • 1 0 • view
Check out the LinkedIn profile with the same name. And yes, I intentionally didn’t say “his” profile.
aug 29, 2025, 10:58 pm • 0 0 • view
www.reddit.com/r/cybersecur... www.reddit.com/r/cybersecur... reddit came to the same conclusion, someone's roleplaying
aug 30, 2025, 1:04 am • 9 0 • view
and uh judging by the replies in the thread, it's someone who is convinced their phone is spying on them, and is asking chatgpt to imagine possible vulnerabilities, and then posting them to github, reddit, etc
aug 30, 2025, 1:07 am • 18 0 • view
yikes
aug 30, 2025, 1:08 am • 10 0 • view
The last time this happened (which was yesterday, btw) this was also my conclusion
aug 30, 2025, 1:11 am • 11 1 • view
endless september arriving a bit early i guess
aug 30, 2025, 1:16 am • 5 0 • view
The guys repos are pure AI slop.
aug 30, 2025, 1:24 am • 2 0 • view
Slopcurity researchers and slopcurity engineers.
aug 30, 2025, 1:25 am • 1 0 • view
look at their other GitHub repositories - one has “C2 post-compromise indicators” confirmed by MobileAssets being queried, and Find My/friends doing key rotation in logs
aug 30, 2025, 2:26 am • 0 0 • view
100% slop. The entire evidence is "I think these are debug only logs" and some of that is flimsy too. It's just written like slop too.
aug 30, 2025, 1:01 am • 3 0 • view