I never advocated for concentration of wealth. I advocate for a robust competitive market as free of gov/t interference as possible. I would allow some leeway for safety concerns and even some for environmental concerns as long as they are scientifically sound, unlike the climate change hoax.
you had me until "climate change hoax." That's just core science and numbers. No, we don't know exactly what will happen, and it won't be the "end of everything," but it's going to be really bad for people. "As free of gov/t interference as possible." I prefer "as free as sensible."
You are a big gov't supporter. I am not. I prefer freedom and responsibility. The "climate crisis" is a lie. Not one of their dire predictions dating back to the mid 70's has come true. It is just power grab to expand gov't control in the name of and "existential threat". But you like that
You have a bad case of libertarianism. I don't think logic and sense will be strong enough to help you. Good luck. You're likely to be angry most of your life.
I do place much value in freedom & responsibility. They are the bedrock of a prosperous and just society. No logic can support your positions. They start from false premises and lies. As for your parting shot, I am one of the happiest people alive. You are in for a life of disappointment.
You're an AI bot.
Strange how even though it's a "lie," not one of you can point to the scientist who started it. It should take a competent scholar under 10 minutes in the age of GoogleScholar, but there is not one among you.
Science is a matter of theories being tested by facts. ALL the postulations put forth by climate change advocates have been proven false over the past 70 years. The authors of the original study have admitted that much of their data was faulty or fabricated.
"The authors of the original study" bullshit. You have no idea who they are, what they published, or how it might have been faulty, let along that "they" admitted to anything. You're a consummate bullshitter.
I learned long ago not to do peoples research for them. They don't value the truth if they don't find it for themselves. If you care, do your research. If you don't care, keep your lazy uninformed opinion that I am a consummate BS'er. If you don't have the courage to look it up, I understand.
You're the one who does not value the truth. If climate change is a hoax, there was a hoaxer, and thanks to the scientific journal archives, it should take you less than 10 minutes to find his name. yet none of you can do it.
"Science is a matter of theories being tested by facts" the first experimental demonstration of CO2's greenhouse effect was in 1859. If it's a lie, the liar involved should take you under 10 minutes to find.
Animals breath in oxygen and breath out CO2. Vegetation takes in the CO2 and the byproduct is oxygen. See how life and the planet works? Carbon Monoxide is poisonous gas that will kill. Learn what to fear and how to recognize the truth.
" Vegetation takes in the CO2 and the byproduct is oxygen." Vegetation does it very slowly, which is why CO2's concentration has risen, and in the meantime it warms the climate. Do try to keep up.
Conspiracy theories, the stupid ones anyway, are infinitely malliable. "The cabal of evil scientists who started the hoax are hiding in the deep state!" Or something similar..
I will leave you with Socialism makes working people slaves to those who don't. Slavery is evil. Being so eager to put that yoke on others puts it on you too. Climate change is a lie. All its predictions have failed. It is just another way to put a yoke on you.
If climate change is a lie, it started with one scientist whose name should be trivially easy for you to look up. Yet none of you eminent scholars seem able to do it.
I've already wasted too much time on shit stirring losers like frenchfry dude. He could be an AI bot; immune to normal conversational responses. Sane people know climate change wasn't invented, it was brought up as a potential problem in the late 19th century, way before oil became big business.