Just because there are zero evidence for something, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Ask religious people. We are clueless when it comes to consciousness and life in general. I don't support cruelty to animals. And if you try and claim it one more time - it will be the end of this conversation.
OK you have capitulated, your argument is a nonsense. You are supporting cruelty to animals because this is animal agriculture. Protesting that it should be humane is a nonsense, it isn't and you still pay for it. Do you support the dog meat trade? Think about it.
I guess you really can't read. You consider raising one cow, using its milk, and when the time comes - slaughter and eat it, to be cruelty to animals. Most people don't You're imposing your fucked up, stuck up, Karen point of view on me, and trying to justify it. I warned you. Now, fuck off.
Oh yeah, you're now muted. Have fun screaming into the void. I bet you have a lot of smart things to say. Let it all out. Have fun with it.
You have conceded defeat.
So post your scientific evidence. You have so far only posted opinion and excuses for supporting cruelty.
So post the science to support your suggestions that 1. animals are not sentient and 2. plants are sentient. And why are you choosing to support cruelty to animals when it's unnecessary?
Again, you're missing the point. Sentience is an arbitrary tool to use when drawing the line separating moral from immoral. You are following a feeling. An emotion. Subjective. And you're trying to pass it as logic. Fact. But logic and facts are not on your side. They are on mine.
At the end of the day, we are both defining some line, arbitrarily, that we will not cross. I won't eat dogs. You won't eat cows. Morally, we're on the same footing. But you're trying to claim we're not, which is misguided. You're also trying to shame, which is disgusting. You're not good at this.
You are posting opinions, not science. We know animals are sentient. Why are you here if the suffering you cause doesn't bother you in some way?