And still, there are other examples where the predictions proved to be accurate or even understated. For example, the global rise in CO2 levels and temperatures.
And still, there are other examples where the predictions proved to be accurate or even understated. For example, the global rise in CO2 levels and temperatures.
1. "Their graph was right so ours is valid" isn't a scientific argument. 2. Not naming who you're talking about doesn't help at all. 3. The upturn in global temperatures and CO2 started over a hundred years ago. I know Lancet lacks scientific standards, but that doesn't mean that the public should.
Just realized part of the issue here. Look at the years on the y-axis. The gaps between ticks change from three years before ~2020 to 11 and then 15 years after 2020, which exaggerates the impression of acceleration.