If you really think about it, it's a play on word for Jeans. Even so, that doesn't make much sense. What a waste of millions of dollars really, but that's the point anyway since any publicity is good publicity.
Replies
Yes, because we all know a pun that gives a head nod to eugenics is a brilliant fucking idea.
aug 26, 2025, 12:49 pm • 47 0 • view
I, for one, am looking forward to when everyone stops talking about that stupid fucking ad.
aug 26, 2025, 9:33 pm • 0 0 • view
If they'd had a bunch of models, even if she was the only famous one and the featured one they could have avoided this largely "we all have good jeans".
aug 26, 2025, 2:54 pm • 8 0 • view
My theory is that that was the plan, the Sweeney one was just the first one, but the controversy made them just ditch the whole thing.
aug 26, 2025, 4:33 pm • 2 0 • view
Honestly remove the dogwhistle and i don't hate the campaign. It's a pun people enjoy.
aug 26, 2025, 11:49 pm • 1 0 • view
Yeah, I think it’s blown out of proportion. This week it’s Cracker Barrel.
aug 26, 2025, 11:52 pm • 0 0 • view
I don't really know Cracker Barrel, I'm from the UK but the after pictures look much easier to keep clean, which is good in a restaurant
aug 27, 2025, 12:38 am • 0 0 • view
Oh? I didn’t know they’d changed the interior too. I thought people were just fake-mad about the people they imagined being mad about the logo.
aug 27, 2025, 12:40 am • 0 0 • view
It is mostly that I think.
aug 27, 2025, 12:48 am • 1 0 • view
they certainly did Not See the discourse, the outrage, the Fuhrer it would cause
aug 26, 2025, 3:15 pm • 1 0 • view
aug 26, 2025, 3:16 pm • 0 0 • view
I'm sure they did, just smiling in the background for a massive traffic of views and discourse like any sociopath on YouTube and Discord.
aug 26, 2025, 3:31 pm • 2 0 • view