Depends. Did Heathrow elect to save on use of system charges by removing their secondary power supply from Laleham (I don't know.) If they did, heads ought to roll.
Depends. Did Heathrow elect to save on use of system charges by removing their secondary power supply from Laleham (I don't know.) If they did, heads ought to roll.
Well, I can't answer your question. Surely though, this once in a lifetime occurrence shouldn't mean someone losing their job. As with aviation accidents, when something goes wrong, we learn.
But the loss of a single point of supply is not a once-in-a-lifetime event. It's quite likely. The national control centre, where I once worked, is fed from two different substations for precisely this reason. It's a basic design principle.
Well, i think you make a very good point. That said, I am what used to be known as an OAP, which means I'm only 11 years younger than the airport, and I don't recall this occurrence before. From my point of view it is once in a lifetime.