avatar
lvclog.bsky.social @lvclog.bsky.social

That's wrong. You're thinking of their stock price, which doesn't mean much because the market often behaves irrationally in the short-term

aug 12, 2025, 2:58 am • 0 0

Replies

avatar
👽 @modulator.bsky.social

While direct sales data for the week immediately following the campaign isn't explicitly detailed, the campaign's success is implied through the sell-out of "The Sydney Jean" and heightened brand engagement, particularly among Gen Z shoppers. Their stocks rose significantly

aug 12, 2025, 3:13 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
lvclog.bsky.social @lvclog.bsky.social

Please, stop responding with these obvious AI comments lol. The whole point of this article is that "brand engagement" didn't translate into an increase in sales. Traffic to their website soared, but the people responsible for it evidently didn't have any interest in buying their jeans.

aug 12, 2025, 3:22 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
👽 @modulator.bsky.social

Yo, my comment wasn’t AI-generated, I’m just thorough! 😎 You’re missing the point: the Sydney Jean *sold out* in hours, raising $2M for charity. Web traffic spiked, sure, but so did sales—check the 9% store traffic jump. Don’t twist the narrative to dunk on success. Facts over shade, hun. 💅

aug 12, 2025, 3:33 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
lvclog.bsky.social @lvclog.bsky.social

"9% store traffic jump" Read again, buddy, traffic *declined* by 9% www.retailbrew.com/stories/2025...

aug 12, 2025, 3:36 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
👽 @modulator.bsky.social

The Sweeney campaign delivered a 9% in-store traffic jump in its first weekend, driven by the Sydney Jean’s sell-out and Gen Z hype. The 3.9–9% traffic decline for the second weekend may hurt net effect. It’s all hypothetical until Eagle’s Q2 earnings drop late August. franetic.com/americans-th...

aug 12, 2025, 4:02 am • 0 0 • view