Libs of tiktok is similar to Charlie, but it's all worded the same, and it's under post regarding cuomo and mamdani polls results. They dont have to say it directly, but the fact they acknowledge it under a poll result says who they are favoring. Put two and two together.
I was told that subtext and context can’t be considered, when judging Zohran Mamdani over his defense of people using slogans that are very clearly calls to commit violence against Jews across the world, and I was only allowed to read his statements 100% literally. Why is this different?
Propaganda works on you my friend. Thats all im gonna say. And I'll leave it at that.
But it doesn’t work on you, I’m sure. It’s kind of telling that you run away when confronted with this question. If Mamdani can’t be held accountable for the implication that his statements carry, why is Cuomo accountable for implied statements of MAGA racists that attack his opponent?