avatar
quackometer.bsky.social @quackometer.bsky.social

... there has been no serious engagement with those papers. No-one read them. This is because I am discussing biology with ideologists, not enquiring minds.

aug 26, 2025, 7:40 pm • 0 0

Replies

avatar
Joe Poulin @joepoulin.bsky.social

That’s incorrect. You’ve ignored the responses that prove you wrong, that doesn’t mean that they aren’t in the thread. It also doesn’t mean that the people who aren’t ignorant are the ones without “inquiring minds”.

aug 26, 2025, 10:00 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
quackometer.bsky.social @quackometer.bsky.social

No responses have proven me wrong. If I am wrong, what point has proven me wrong?

aug 26, 2025, 10:01 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Abyssal Doomrock @deathbymeteor.bsky.social

Multiple people have pointed out that you didn't actually read most of the papers you claim support you, because they either don't support you, or don't say what you claim they say. But facts aren't going to shake your faith in your bullshit

aug 26, 2025, 10:09 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Joe Poulin @joepoulin.bsky.social

He claims he can’t see those explanations. :)

aug 26, 2025, 10:21 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
Joe Poulin @joepoulin.bsky.social

I just told you. The ones that you’re ignoring. Notice how you’re ignoring my other replies in this thread and only responding to this one, to claim that I should repost the other ones? Lol.

aug 26, 2025, 10:21 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
John Roddy @roddyi.com

Most forms of multicellular life are hermaphrodites. And that includes quite a few of our fishy little friends.

aug 26, 2025, 10:14 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Dawn @funky7monkey.bsky.social

You've declared yourself "not wrong" with a binary sex definition that leaves people without a sex (or with more than one?), declared that a female is female regardless of karyotype, contrary to your own ascertation that karyotype is deterministic, and ignorant of phenotype changing over time.

aug 26, 2025, 10:12 pm • 5 0 • view
avatar
quackometer.bsky.social @quackometer.bsky.social

You simply are not bright enough to understand what is being said here.

aug 26, 2025, 10:37 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
Joe Poulin @joepoulin.bsky.social

Okay, remember when you asked how people are able to tell who is ignorant? A lot of the times you can look for the folks who can’t address the comments someone makes, and instead just switches to random insults.

aug 26, 2025, 10:53 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Ray @rayearth.bsky.social

Once again, you resort to telling people they're not bright enough, when you can't refute their counterarguments. You really, really are bad at playing the intellectual. You should be riding around in your beater shouting "YOU'RE DECEPTICONS" at Gen Alpha teens so they can rip on you in person.

aug 27, 2025, 12:24 am • 4 0 • view
avatar
Dawn @funky7monkey.bsky.social

Truly a genius among us, a contrarian resorting to intellectual insults in place of science.

aug 26, 2025, 10:47 pm • 4 0 • view
avatar
Dawn @funky7monkey.bsky.social

Anyways, sex is bimodal, mutable, and way too complicated to be exclusively defined by male and female.

aug 26, 2025, 11:49 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Ray @rayearth.bsky.social

You've been dogwalked this entire thread and you are the type of person for whom ignorance is bliss; because you don't understand it, you can't see it, and thus you don't acknowledge it.

aug 26, 2025, 7:58 pm • 3 0 • view