My position was adopted from a seminal paper in the evolution of sex. You have provided zero papers as an alternative. It’s not my position that does not have scientific backing.
Replies
The paper explicitly acknowledges that people exist who have both male and female gametes. You do realize they acknowledge that, and it's actually part of the discussion, right?
aug 29, 2025, 2:23 pm • 11 0 • view
Quote the bit that says that.
aug 29, 2025, 2:24 pm • 0 0 • view
But let me tell you your error. You are confusing the biological term “hermaphrodite” for the old fashioned use of the term to describe some rare disorders. In the first an organism can play both B reproductive roles. In the second they cannot.
aug 29, 2025, 2:25 pm • 0 0 • view
Uh... that's not even remotely true.
aug 29, 2025, 2:27 pm • 5 0 • view
aug 29, 2025, 2:29 pm • 0 0 • view
Flowers, my guy. Flowers. Easiest example straight off the top of my head,
aug 29, 2025, 2:31 pm • 12 0 • view
What are you on about mate?
aug 29, 2025, 3:01 pm • 0 0 • view
You claimed that an organism cannot play both reproductive roles. Lots and lots of organisms play both (or all) reproductive roles.
aug 29, 2025, 3:03 pm • 2 0 • view
This dude does not even understand that the paper he's citing is not specifically discussing humans but rather systems in living beings.
aug 29, 2025, 2:34 pm • 13 0 • view
In understand that absolutely. The paper is about why no more than two sexes have ever evolved in a billion years
aug 29, 2025, 2:44 pm • 0 0 • view
LOL
aug 29, 2025, 2:51 pm • 8 0 • view
What did I say that was wrong and made you laugh?
aug 29, 2025, 2:52 pm • 0 0 • view
That's not true there is a four sex white sparrow. www.molecularecologist.com/2016/02/10/s...
aug 31, 2025, 5:10 am • 0 0 • view
I'm almost embarrassed for him. Almost, but not quite.
aug 29, 2025, 2:36 pm • 6 0 • view
Oh, sweetie, did you have to use Google to try to understand what the article meant? That's precious.
aug 29, 2025, 2:30 pm • 2 0 • view
LOL No, sweetie, that's not what I'm doing at all. It's so funny. You had NO idea they even discussed that in the article and then had to CTRL + F search and find it and then make stuff up to pretend you knew it was there. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
aug 29, 2025, 2:28 pm • 4 0 • view
You are making this error. I know this. It is a common error among the gender-addled.
aug 29, 2025, 2:31 pm • 0 0 • view
You "know" And thank you, yet AGAIN, for conflating sex and gender. You're doing great LOL
aug 29, 2025, 2:32 pm • 2 0 • view
LOL You didn't even know that 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
aug 29, 2025, 2:25 pm • 2 0 • view
LOL No it wasn't.
aug 29, 2025, 2:20 pm • 3 0 • view
I explicitly said I was adopting the definitions in the glossary of that paper. You did your best to misunderstand them as always.
aug 29, 2025, 2:23 pm • 0 0 • view
Yes, and your adopted definitions prove sex is bimodal.
aug 29, 2025, 2:24 pm • 1 0 • view
No they do not. That is just your stupid interpretation.
aug 29, 2025, 2:26 pm • 0 0 • view
Cry harder LOL
aug 29, 2025, 2:27 pm • 0 0 • view