You are putting words in my mouth. I have explicitly said that is a logical possibility that some cases may be hard to classify. That does not mean (a) there are not classes than male and female for sexes ; (b) they still are either male or female. More straw man arguments.
If you cannot lay out a rule that objectively sorts the hard cases into one of two exes, (b) cannot be true.
That is not true. Difficulties in classification may be due to lack of perfect knowledge not the existence of other classes.
Are you suggesting that you lack the knowledge to sort the hard cases into one of the two sexes?
This seems like a real problem if you are arguing a maximalist position.
It's not the only problem he's had, but it's definitely one of the funnier ones.
Indeed. People like Caster Semenya were classified as female at birth as they were born into communities where there was not the expertise to gain the right knowledge to understand their condition. At puberty it was obvious he was a man.
Did you... look at the post you were responding to?
We tried to explain to you 72 hours ago that even assuming perfect knowledge does not let you escape the fundamental issue that you can’t even define discrete criteria for your classification.