The point that I used a LLM to create an answer is immaterial to whether or not the answer is factually correct or not.
The point that I used a LLM to create an answer is immaterial to whether or not the answer is factually correct or not.
Correction, the point is that you used LLM as an attempt to create illusory support for your unsupported but desired "answer".
No, The LLM crafted an explanation. You are too dishonest to evaluate if it is correct or not. SO you want to argue about the method of production rather than its content. Far easier for you to do that.
Besides the answer being straight up incorrect, if you thought that the method of production was irrelevant, you wouldn't have bothered to fraudulently fabricate "proofs "