Good faith would include doing things like providing evidence to support your claims when those claims are challenged. On a related note: what's the evidence to support your previous claim that the majority of instances of gynecomastia are "voluntary"?

Holy shit. “Gynecomastia is voluntary”??? Does he not know what the word means?

Have fun!

Holy shit! Wow, the confident ignorance is staggering. No wonder he fell for that “AGP” nonsense.

I'm choosing to interpret "AGP" as "agitprop".

And you'd actually be technically-accidentally correct, the nearly best kind of correct.

If we're referring to the acronym as the creation of TERFs to try and hide their bigotry behind scientific-sounding terminology, then maybe not quite that accidental.

"Ah I see you've played knifey-bullshit before."

Eat shit.

Hey, is this also redblue?

Nah, Kev isn’t this controlled.

I just call him by his real name which is Michael, because he hid anonymously, harassing others for the later part of a decade, I don't think he deserves to be treated with respect.

Is that why you haven't answered whether or not you can dispute the claim that 'male' and 'female' are shortcut terms laypeople use for the most prevalent outcomes from the gender roulette wheel, instead of the SCIENCE-SAYS only possible outcomes? I'm muted? Or was it the you-hate-freedom thing?