Yet people still think that the imbecile Biden was a great presidolt... Which reality shows us clearly is impossible. You can't be both an accessory to a fascist coup and a great presidolt, and Biden was clearly an accessory to a fascist coup even though he tried to pretend it didn't exist.
What gets me are the dolts that blame Biden for Trump. The topic is TRUMP being horrible….try to follow along
Imagine giving excuses for Hitler being Hitler. They don't need a reason to be fascist nazis.
LMAOOO. I guess we've heard from the moron caucus. What's it like, living in a fact-free alternative reality?
So you're telling us all that you are part of the moron caucus? If you weren't, you'd agree with me, because under Biden's derelict watch american women lost some major civil rights to a corrupt supreme court and a criminal former presidolt got off Scott free for a legion of crimes including
I believe you are one of the troll/bot caucus…..an annoying carryover feature from X….I bet you jump on multiple negative posts about the Pedo in Chief to give a whataboutism analysis…piss off
No, idiot; I'm aware of the fact that the imbecile democraps like Biden refuse to learn from history or experience and always as a result choose to take advantage of every opportunity they have to avoid holding republicans accountable for their actual crimes.
an attempted insurrection as well as an attempted coup.
It's really enjoyable watching the GOP Reich in desperate panic. You're a perfect example.
You mean the Supreme Court Trump appointed? What does that have to do with Biden? I am soooooo confused. Can you please help me understand how Biden is responsible for what the Supreme Court that Trump appointed BEFORE Biden was President did?
What did Biden do regarding reforming the supreme court like he pledged during his campaign? Nothing. What did Biden or any other Dem do to address the corruption and criminality in the scrotus? Nothing.
Biden was a good president.
When a bridge builder builds a bridge that collapses three weeks after it's opened they are regarded as a bad bridge builder. Biden's accomplishments lasted for approximately three weeks past his term. So in other words, you have lower standards for the POTUS than for a small bridge builder.
Biden was a good president.
What did he accomplish that still stands today other than his dereliction of duty? The economy is crashing, inflation is rising, the US standing in the world is toast, and the traitor that Biden's dereliction of duty helped back into office is just getting started destroying the country.
What's the good part? Oh right, the fact that Biden distracted the country from the systemic destruction of american democracy that was going on right under his nose.
Wait, if Biden was not a "great presidolt", he could be considered a great President? That is what you are saying?
No, he was a sack of shit who tried to distract from the five-alarm fire burning the foundation of the nation's democracy instead of upholding his oath of office.
So he WAS a great "presidolt"? I am still confused. Please explain with data.
Why are you still talking about Biden? How about focus on the five-alarm happening right now under the 🍊🌮.
Because those who refuse to learn from history are guaranteed to repeat it.
Because Shitlers not following the project 2025 playbook like 1930's Germany... ... aparently something to do with Biden and history no one's learned from? Biden blamers are broken records.
Agree
I blocked him. No time for fools. They never learn.
You need a lot of help.
He overall wasn't seen as a great president. He was simply seen as the greatest choice over what we knew we would have if we didn't choose him. Trump
That was almost certainly his plan for the second term that he promised not to seek.
The paucity of intelligent thought here is striking, but really shines through most in your feeble attempt to make up a new word, which apparently seeks to demean the highly-respected former President but instead simply reveals your own rhetorical weakness and inarticulate foolishness.
The reality is that you're in denial. Biden is the person who chose him s attorney general, and let him remain in office even after leaping aggressively to the criminal former presidolt's defense and then blocking investigation into his role in the insurrection for two years.
The attorney general is one of the president's most important cabinet members, and the only two possibilities are that Biden chose an idiot intentionally or he was too stupid to choose wisely. Either way, he failed the nation catastrophically.
If a CEO has done the same thing, he'd be shredded, yet people extol the president who failed exactly the same way but on a much bigger scale. It's hypocrisy. And shows that the highest office has the lowest standards, which is dumb.
This last post is the one I fully agree with. The standards are incredibly low. But all of us voters are the hiring team responsible for raising those standards, and journalists are our org. consultants. You cannot simply blame a few Democratic party leaders and absolve voters and the media.
The reality is that you're an anti-Dem dead-ender who will forever remain convinced that, despite decades of democratic backsliding, the failure of Dems to stop Donald Trump was incompetence or complicity, that it couldn't *possibly* be a complex and fraught situation but must be more nefarious.
It IS cowardice, complicity, and corruption. They make that very, very obvious repeatedly. There's a reason that the establishment dems stifle the progressives' attempts to push bills to get money out of politics... it's because they're on the take.
This magical thinking, that Dems have easy tools to defeat GOP and fascism but just don't use them, is overly simplistic, and it feeds into the growing political nihilism and ambivalence that's making it ever harder to actually defeat them democratically as we need to do.
No it's not. You're just making excuse for why the cowardly idiots never even attempt to accomplish anything, and why even when they have majorities in both houses the republicans continue to run the show. You're just making excuses for their complicity.
There was no appeasement. Over 1,000 insurrectionists were brought to trial and convicted. That's the reason Trump had 1,600 pardons ready to go right off the bat. Suggesting Biden and Garland pursued a strategy of "appeasement" is offensively misguided.
And not one single leader even faced a trial for that insurrection. That is the very definition of appeasement -- go after the peons to appease the mindless masses, and let the republicans off the hook to appease the oligarchs. And you are proving that it worked.
Convicting the ringleader is always harder, since they don't commit the acts themselves. They had to tread carefully and try to build an iron-clad case for *convicting a former President of the United States*. I wish it had gone faster, but it wasn't a case of actively impeding things.
People keep bringing up that pathetic excuse, but the reality is that you don't build an iron clad case by refusing to investigate the leader, and the 500 testimonials from insurrectionist pawns pleading guilty and fingering the orange traitor should have been far more than enough for arrest.
Those came during the summer of 2021. There is absolutely no excuse for letting the insurrectionist in chief stay free for that long. Every other country in the world that has had to deal with insurrectionists had them in jail in days to await their trials.
The Biden administration and Merrick Garbage have absolutely no excuse for their flagrant dereliction of duty.
And guess what? Just like if the people had voted for Hillary Clinton the Supreme Court would now have a liberal majority, if the people had voted for Kamala Harris, Donald Trump would be facing sentencing in New York, and there would still be at least one more case with a promise of conviction.
... so saith the actual imbecile. Biden "an accessory to a coup"? 😂 This baseless delusion disqualifies you from judging anyone an imbecile.
Facilitating a criminal getting away with the crime is by law accessory after the fact, so by law he is in fact an accessory to the fascist coup. He had several opportunities to put a stop to it, requiring nothing more than simply enforcing the law, and squandered every one to appease the guilty.
You've no idea what happened, you're making a fool of yourself. Trump was convicted in one case. Republicans on Supreme court interfered. In another, corrupt judge Aileen Cannon interfered. Biden had NOTHING to do with it. He CAN'T prosecute anyway. Hope you're not as ignorant of Canadian politics.
I think you need to put down the crack pipe.
It's amazing how far people will go to justify the slime occupying the White House now.
Truth be told, we wouldn't be here if Ford hadn't pardoned Nixon. The Repugs were emboldened then and have been doing dirty tricks ever since. I can understand the Biden administration not wanting to divide the country and risk civil war, but it looks like that is coming.
That's true; and since the dems adopted that appeasement tradition, they've been continuing to embolden the criminals. The people trusted Biden to do something different from the usual appeasement, and he stuck to tradition in a fit of stupidity, and the fact that so many think he was great
will lead to a repeat with the next time there's a Dem presidolt. Does anyone really believe that another institutionalist idiot too chicken to even attempt to get the fascist loyalists out of government, the FBI, etc? With another Biden to follow this regime nothing at all will change.
Reagan did away with the truth in news and then installed his buddy Murdock and Fox news to propagandize. These magats only source of news is Fox and they are so brainwashed they will never see the truth.
The FD never required truthfulness nor did it pertain to the news. It applied to editorial content. It required that broadcast radio and tv allocate some time to issues of public interest and, in so doing, present various points of view.
“Reagan did away with the truth in news and then installed his buddy Murdock and Fox news to propagandize.” 1. “Truth in News” has never been a thing in the U.S. see 1A. 2. FNC didn’t start until he was well out of office.
There was the Fairness doctrine. If a station gave an editorial, they had to air an equal opposing view on the station. I grew up with this. Reagan got rid of it and it was also never transferred to cable.
This skeet disproves your initial skeet about a “truth in news” policy. The Fairness Doctrine never required equal time. It could not have been extended to cable.
Oh, there you are!
Hello!
The FD was not a truth in news policy. And you aren’t even getting the specifics of it correct. It couldn’t transfer to cable either. Stop posting bullshit. You were wrong. Admit it.
You may have grown up with it but you certainly don’t remember it. There was no “equal opposing view” rule. Go look up the text of the FD and/or the excellent Congressional Research Service report on it. And it wasn’t “transferred to cable” because it would have been unconstitutional to do so.
Or just read the original. (waiting for kalendae and brentwood to show up!) www.fcc.gov/document/edi...
He was a good President but was playing by 19th century rules while the other side had no rules. His administration was incredibly naive in thinking Trump or his supporters would care whether decorum was followed when he turned over power.
In spite of the fact that neither dump nor his supporters even pretended to care about decorum or laws the first time around. Once that could be called naive, but this has been a decades long pattern that idiots like Biden are simply too stupid to see or learn from.
This right here, it's a increasingly serious failing of the old guard.
It was not a good omen when they all attended the Inauguration. They should NOT have! It was only giving him legitimacy after calling him a wanna be fascist dictator during the campaign. So, was that just lip service?
Yes, it was. Biden pledged not to seek a second term, yet made campaign promises like scrotus reform a feature of his second campaign instead of trying to accomplish them. He was trying to use the traitor to get a second term.
How about linking to the pledge, so we can start with your baseline for truth.
Are you as stupid as a republican? You're actually trying to revise history to avoid admitting that Biden failed the nation and the world? Ignoring the many criticisms he received for breaking his promise to only seek one term?
So, no link? You know, the only thing I actually asked for. But, by all means go through your rant and stamp your feet over nothing I said. Thanks anyway. Have a great day!🍸
He was a good President who tried to be congenial with his opponents. Essentially brought a knife to a gunfight.
He was a dumb president who gave his fascist opponents everything they wanted instead of serving his country because he too set in his ways to recognize the fascist coup slapping him in the face daily.
President Biden WAS great. He followed the law and got a conviction out of Donald. We had a great economy and was respected around the globe. But the purists who, when they don't get 100% of what they want, will go back to the evil or allow evil to win when the good becomes perfect's enemy.
He wasn't great; he was at best adequate, because the economy he helped build is no longer great thanks to allowing his insurrectionist predecessor to get away with his crimes without any penalties or consequences.