And you keep lying about this. Never read the White Paper of 1939? It's not a "colonial" presence. It's an independent nation, something the GAZA is not. The GAZA was in fact EGYPT just as the West Bank was Transjordan. Maybe read more.
And you keep lying about this. Never read the White Paper of 1939? It's not a "colonial" presence. It's an independent nation, something the GAZA is not. The GAZA was in fact EGYPT just as the West Bank was Transjordan. Maybe read more.
No lies at all. It most certainly is a colonial presence. Even the Zionists admit it. And it's clear by now that I've read far more than you'll ever come to read in your natural life.
You keep posting this for which you have no citation. It's idiotic on your part. Israel is going nowhere. And you seem to think that HAMAS can not end this war. They have had ample opportunity to do so. Everyone else knows HAMAS and Hezbollah have to be gone, except you.
LOL The PICA as a colonization tool is well known, and well-attested by multiple sources (Britannica, Wikipedia, etc.) I know you think you're scoring some point here, but its kind of like you want proof that "UN" stands for "United Nations". en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palesti...
waddesdon.org.uk/palestine-je...
www.encyclopedia.com/religion/enc...
And since you NEVER post any sources, that puts me about, oh, a billion light years ahead of you, child.
"Where there was no attack—we should not strike," I have to reverse search to find your source for your bull shit because you seem unable to cite properly. There is no genocidal intent in there. You seem unclear about what a genocide is.
LOL the source was cited in the article itself. Don't blame me because you knee-jerk a response before even halfway reading the text. Your sloppiness is your own failing, not anybody else's. 😄
And Ben Gurion's hands are very, very bloody - you won't be successfully peddling any of that nonsense around here. Lydda, Ramlah, and Deir Yassin have his fingerprints all over them. Your problem is that you *want* to be lied to by hasbara. And you want others to share your delusion. Fat chance.
No. THIS writer, whoever it is is giving their interpretation of the Ben Gurion Defense Policy, which is why you can't seem to cite where this came from.
Flatly incorrect, as I've shown in another response. You can't tell the difference between actual historical facts and Israeli hasbara designed for critics of Zionism. Ben Gurion was every bit as violent and fascist as the rest of the Zionist founders of Israel.
The Ben Gurion Doctrine is from the 1950's and emphasizes the pursuit of peace, you moron.
1950s - yep. So what? The point was to illustrate the unbroken doctrine of Zionist terrorism: before the mandate, during the mandate, after the state of Israel, and right to the present day. You're either badly informed, or just lying, about Ben Gurion:
No citation. And there is a reason for that.
LOL and as I said: you're a crappy reader. The citation is in the article: It's from Ben Gurion's diaries, which appeared in Yediot Ahronot, April 17, 1983.
Colonialism intends to erase evidence of the original inhabitants and plant Europeans under a poetic settler mythology used to rally the newcomers:
Herzl admitted that Zionists were engaged in colonialism - maybe you should read more: 🤣🤣🤣