so the man with the gun gets to decide all on his own who lives and who dies
so the man with the gun gets to decide all on his own who lives and who dies
The man in the Executive Suite of any health insurance company has killed more people than can be documented. No blood on his hands because the denials deaths weren’t for political reasons, but for PROFIT. Death by policy is ok. MONEY decides who lives and who dies in America and you know it.
Or, instead of just shoving your fingers in your ear and screaming "La la LAAA" maybe you could try putting aside your prejudices and actually listen and pay attention to what's going on around you. And why are you strawmanning?
it’s not a strawman, you literally just said it’s good to kill people if the gunman had a good enough reason for it
It is very much a strawman. Even your interpretation of my words is a strawman because you are being hostile towards anyone who disagrees with you and that 100% is a you problem.
No they didn't "literally" just say that actually, learn what words mean
That isn't what she said.
Maybe we could try asking nicely that corporations stop killing us for profit? Have we tried that? Maybe we could sign a petition? Maybe we could go for a peaceful march through town? Perhaps we should beg and grovel at their feet, maybe that would work? Who's paying you to be so willingly obtuse?
actually the man who makes billions denying your healthcare gets to decide all on his own who lives and who dies, and someone who he's decided to let die is allowed to fight back with equal force. That's called self-defense, not murder
Or, people can differentiate ideologically motivated killings based on the other factors. It turns out that John Brown and Ted Bundy aren't morally equivalent and I can notice differences. Do you prefer the man with the money deciding who lives and dies based not on ideology, but what makes money?