What Constitution? He's obviously not in the USA; in no State of the Union will open carry 'get you shot'. It may cause the police to confront you and require compliance but it's not a shoot-on-sight 'provocation'.
What Constitution? He's obviously not in the USA; in no State of the Union will open carry 'get you shot'. It may cause the police to confront you and require compliance but it's not a shoot-on-sight 'provocation'.
Fof example as one of the arguments I listed, EO 14160 which is blatantly unconstitutional. This guy pretends to care about the letter of the law, yet Im assuming hes fine with this unconstitutional order.
EO 14160 doesn't exist.
@entus.bsky.social ⬇️ I can dismiss proof just like you did with Rittenhouse. 😂
I was referring to other arguments the guy wont address cause hell get cooked. Not referring to Rittenhouse.
I'll debate you on any subject as long as I can nullify any evidence that doesn't support my argument. Just like you did with Rittenhouse. Deal?
Thats not what happened.
That's exactly what happened. Despite proof of the contrary, you still maintain that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with a firearm.