avatar
Jason Mullagan 🐧 @jasonmullagan.bsky.social

What Constitution? He's obviously not in the USA; in no State of the Union will open carry 'get you shot'. It may cause the police to confront you and require compliance but it's not a shoot-on-sight 'provocation'.

aug 31, 2025, 7:39 am • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Fof example as one of the arguments I listed, EO 14160 which is blatantly unconstitutional. This guy pretends to care about the letter of the law, yet Im assuming hes fine with this unconstitutional order.

sep 1, 2025, 12:56 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

EO 14160 doesn't exist.

sep 1, 2025, 1:07 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Strange.

image
sep 1, 2025, 8:11 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

sep 1, 2025, 8:28 pm • 1 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

@entus.bsky.social ⬇️ I can dismiss proof just like you did with Rittenhouse. 😂

sep 1, 2025, 8:30 pm • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

I was referring to other arguments the guy wont address cause hell get cooked. Not referring to Rittenhouse.

sep 1, 2025, 12:46 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

I'll debate you on any subject as long as I can nullify any evidence that doesn't support my argument. Just like you did with Rittenhouse. Deal?

sep 1, 2025, 1:42 am • 2 0 • view
avatar
Entus @entus.bsky.social

Thats not what happened.

sep 1, 2025, 8:12 pm • 0 0 • view
avatar
factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social

That's exactly what happened. Despite proof of the contrary, you still maintain that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with a firearm.

sep 1, 2025, 8:31 pm • 2 0 • view