avatar
Jamie・ジェイミ・ˈdʒeɪmi @jspieve.bsky.social

I guessed from your latter comments that we might be largely in agreement

aug 3, 2025, 8:46 am • 1 0

Replies

avatar
Jamie・ジェイミ・ˈdʒeɪmi @jspieve.bsky.social

And, echoing your point, when we ask what that better thing is, it will be incomprehensible

aug 3, 2025, 8:49 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dr Stylite @columnist.bsky.social

There is a very interesting theory that science (the way we think the universe works) is largely a function of how human cognition works.

aug 3, 2025, 8:52 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jamie・ジェイミ・ˈdʒeɪmi @jspieve.bsky.social

Back when I spent a lot of time on science forums, one of the members was a philosopher who would argue for pure idealism: our only knowledge of the world comes only from our senses, so our internally-created universe is the only one that exists.

aug 3, 2025, 10:32 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jamie・ジェイミ・ˈdʒeɪmi @jspieve.bsky.social

We can't know anything about an external universe so believing it is there is purely an act of faith. As a "naive realist" I disagreed but could not disagree with any of his arguments

aug 3, 2025, 10:32 am • 0 0 • view
avatar
Jamie・ジェイミ・ˈdʒeɪmi @jspieve.bsky.social

Well, your comment about not understanding a (real) AI got me thinking about the (few) good stories about encounters with intelligent but incomprehensible aliens.

aug 3, 2025, 10:28 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Jamie・ジェイミ・ˈdʒeɪmi @jspieve.bsky.social

And now you have reminded me of one story with fluid/plasma based intelligences where calculus (involving continuous flows, etc) was absolutely basic to them, but integer arithmetic was advanced math.

aug 3, 2025, 10:28 am • 1 0 • view
avatar
Dr Stylite @columnist.bsky.social

Quite possibly!

aug 3, 2025, 8:46 am • 0 0 • view