But the allegation that they are bringing is malfeasance before office. It seems to me the judge and the lawyers are examining whether offence before office is in scope for consideration.

That’s the standard in a lot of executive appointments like the Federal Trade Commission but that standard isn’t expressly stated in the Federal Reserve Act to my knowledge. To be clear, I’m not in favor of this, I’m just trying to look at what the actual law says and worried about its ambiguity.