Maybe just point out your corrections in a straightforward manner rather than making a personal addendum and pointing to your own superfluous job description that supposedly gives you insight into a government agency that I am supposed to instinctively know you have. Not cool
Also look up what the phrase “arguing with” means. Not what was occurring in the tweet you were responding to. We could’ve had (and can still have) a respectful discussion without the seeping condescension in the the introduction. Best of luck
Considering I've spent the last 4 years working on government software for a major agency I'm gonna say my expertise isn't superfluous and I know exactly what I'm talking about. But go off man, keep giving them kudos where it isn't earned.
Oh no the part i found so egotistical is where you came out with the assumption that people subconsciously know your job description and secondly decided to engage in a condescending manner appealing to your job description to shut the conversation down. You could’ve easily approached this
In a manner that doesn’t for one treat the person as operating from position of bad faith and doesn’t in turn make that person assume you’re an asshole. Food for thought.
And after reading all I wrote and that’s the only thing you seemed to fixate enough onto respond kinda confirms that you probably do have a somewhat inflated view of yourself.
As for the Kudos. I conceded I was wrong well before you responded to other comments but see how I replied to them versus go I replied to you. What did they do differently?
As you can see I would concede you are right about everything and I would still think you’re arrogant.