I don’t know to attach the actual article link so I’ll post a photo and hopefully you can get to the article manually and read it.

@r5-to-philly.bsky.social I've read all the claims from that no-name substack. They assert that no changes or fixes were made but they have no substantion. They just say it. And alleging that the EAC forged a document pertaining to NC but linking to a court complaint in Georgia is way out there.

So space and time travel involved but other than that great evidence

Right? I wish that case had gone to trial. I would have loved to see their evidence of a forged doc. It was dismissed because they sued individuals and not just the state and/or relevant government entities. They should have been allowed to amend or they could have refiled. It was not dismissed

with prejudice. law.justia.com/cases/georgi...

Lucky (or unlucky) for you. You can still point out flaws I can't